Is there another lay-person way to re-write President James Madison's quote, "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. Were the federal Constitution, therefore, really chargeable with the accumulationof power, or with a mixture of powers, have a dangerous tendency to such accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to inspire a universal reprobation of the system."?
Is there another lay-person way to re-write President James Madison's quote, "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. Were the federal Constitution, therefore, really chargeable with the accumulationof power, or with a mixture of powers, have a dangerous tendency to such accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to inspire a universal reprobation of the system."?
Related questions
Question
Is there another lay-person way to re-write President James Madison's quote, "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. Were the federal Constitution, therefore, really chargeable with the accumulationof power, or with a mixture of powers, have a dangerous tendency to such accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to inspire a universal reprobation of the system."?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps