Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 408 of the 536 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 393 of the 579 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two independent population means t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for a population proportion z-test for the difference between two population proportions The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer > ≠ < = Select an answer p2 μ2 (please enter a decimal) Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer < > ≠ = Select an answer μ2 p2 (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? ≤ > Based on this, we should Select an answer reject fail to reject accept the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 536 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 579 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 408 of the 536 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 393 of the 579 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two independent population means t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for a population proportion z-test for the difference between two population proportions The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer > ≠ < = Select an answer p2 μ2 (please enter a decimal) Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer < > ≠ = Select an answer μ2 p2 (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? ≤ > Based on this, we should Select an answer reject fail to reject accept the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 536 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 579 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.

Name: Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher th
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 408 of the 536 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 393 of the 579 randomly s

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Topic Video

Question

For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two independent population means t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for a population proportion z-test for the difference between two population proportions
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:

Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer > ≠ < = Select an answer p2 μ2 (please enter a decimal)

Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer < > ≠ = Select an answer μ2 p2 (Please enter a decimal)

The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
The p-value is ? ≤ >
Based on this, we should Select an answer reject fail to reject accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 536 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 579 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.