Interpreting some values from a journal article Find Figure 2(d). Give approximate values for the mean and standard error of the mean for each of the two groups. State whether “mean” here refers to the sample mean or to the true mean. Give an interpretation of the standard error of the mean for the long nap group, in the context of the problem at hand. (This is still referring to the variable illustrated in Figure 2(d).

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
  1. Interpreting some values from a journal article
    1. Find Figure 2(d). Give approximate values for the mean and standard error of the mean for each of the two groups. State whether “mean” here refers to the sample mean or to the true mean. Give an interpretation of the standard error of the mean for the long nap group, in the context of the problem at hand. (This is still referring to the variable illustrated in Figure 2(d).
w The effects of napping on night X
←
|||
onlinelibrary-wiley-com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jsr.13578
The effects of napping on night-time sleep in healthy young adults
MOGRASS ET AL.
FIGURE 2 Comparisons of nocturnal
sleep fragmentation indices and night-
time actigraphic sleep variables between
short naps (≤60 min) and long naps
(>60 min). Independent t tests showed no
significant differences in the night-time
actigraphy fragmentation index, novel
fragmentation index (KRA), total sleep
time (h), sleep onset latency (min), sleep
efficiency, wake after sleep onset (min),
and number of awakenings between
short and long naps (Cohen's d = 0.28;
0.27; 0.04; 0.26; 0.31; 0.02; and 0.16,
respectively). (a) actigraphy fragmentation
index; (b) novel fragmentation index; (c)
total sleep time; (d) sleep onset latency;
(e) sleep efficiency; (f) wake after sleep
onset; (g) number of awakenings. N = 115
evenings (short naps, n = 58; long naps,
n = 57). Values are mean ± SEM
5 / 10
(a)
Actigraphy Fragmentation Index
O
Total Sleep Time (Hours)
30-
20-
Number of Awakenings
10-
(e) 100
80-
60-
40-
20-
0
(g) 501
40-
30-
20-
10-
F
110%
P = 0.14
P = 0.83
p = 0.10
P = 0.39
+
-1
1
1
1
Novel Fragmentation Index (Rest KRA)
0.08-
Sleep Onset Latency (Minutes)
0.06-
0.04-
0.02-
0.00
(d) 50-
(f)
40-
30-
20-
10-
60
40-
20-
0
Journal of
Sleep
Research
F
F
P = 0.15
ESRS
P = 0.17
will
P = 0.90
Short Naps
Long Naps
-1
5 of 10
-1
13652869, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr. 13578 by University Of Guelph, Wiley Online Library on [02/04/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions)
E
S
Update:
Transcribed Image Text:w The effects of napping on night X ← ||| onlinelibrary-wiley-com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jsr.13578 The effects of napping on night-time sleep in healthy young adults MOGRASS ET AL. FIGURE 2 Comparisons of nocturnal sleep fragmentation indices and night- time actigraphic sleep variables between short naps (≤60 min) and long naps (>60 min). Independent t tests showed no significant differences in the night-time actigraphy fragmentation index, novel fragmentation index (KRA), total sleep time (h), sleep onset latency (min), sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset (min), and number of awakenings between short and long naps (Cohen's d = 0.28; 0.27; 0.04; 0.26; 0.31; 0.02; and 0.16, respectively). (a) actigraphy fragmentation index; (b) novel fragmentation index; (c) total sleep time; (d) sleep onset latency; (e) sleep efficiency; (f) wake after sleep onset; (g) number of awakenings. N = 115 evenings (short naps, n = 58; long naps, n = 57). Values are mean ± SEM 5 / 10 (a) Actigraphy Fragmentation Index O Total Sleep Time (Hours) 30- 20- Number of Awakenings 10- (e) 100 80- 60- 40- 20- 0 (g) 501 40- 30- 20- 10- F 110% P = 0.14 P = 0.83 p = 0.10 P = 0.39 + -1 1 1 1 Novel Fragmentation Index (Rest KRA) 0.08- Sleep Onset Latency (Minutes) 0.06- 0.04- 0.02- 0.00 (d) 50- (f) 40- 30- 20- 10- 60 40- 20- 0 Journal of Sleep Research F F P = 0.15 ESRS P = 0.17 will P = 0.90 Short Naps Long Naps -1 5 of 10 -1 13652869, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr. 13578 by University Of Guelph, Wiley Online Library on [02/04/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) E S Update:
w The effects of napping on night X
←
|||
onlinelibrary-wiley-com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jsr.13578
The effects of napping on night-time sleep in healthy young adults
evenings (short naps, n = 58; long naps,
n = 57). Values are mean ± SEM
5 / 10
Total Sleep Time (
(e) ¹00
Sleep Efficiency (%)
80-
Number of Awakenings
60-
40-
20-
0
(g) 50
40-
30-
20-
10-
110% + |
p = 0.10
3.2.2 | The associations of napping behaviours and
daytime activity with actigraphy sleep quality variables
We found no significant differences in actigraphic sleep qual-
ity variables by nap frequency (p > 0.05; Table S2), nap duration
(p > 0.05; Figure 2a,c-g) and daytime activity levels (p > 0.05;
Table 2). However, independent t tests showed that night-time sleep
following late naps versus early naps had a higher actigraphic Fl
(mean [SD] 28.26 [10.69] versus 23.52 [10.83], p = 0.02, d = 0.44;
Figure 3a), TST (mean [SD] 7.20 [1.44] versus 6.52 [1.67] h, p=0.02,
d = 0.44), SOL (mean [SD] 40.76 [45.34] versus 24.56 [26.61] min,
p=0.02, d = 0.44), WASO (mean [SD] 51.59 [30.54] versus
39.01 [22.92] min, p < 0.02, d = 0.43), and number of awakenings
P = 0.39
1
Sleep Onset Latency
(f)
30-
20-
10-
60
40-
20-
0
F
P = 0.90
-1
(mean [SD] 43.82 [14.44] versus 34.82 [13.58], p < 0.01, d = 0.46;
Figure 3c,d,f,g). In contrast, SE showed no significant difference be-
tween early and late naps (p = 0.053; Figure 3e).
3.3 | Correlations between night-time FI and
actigraphy sleep quality variables
Table 3 shows Pearson correlations between the KRA and night-time
sleep quality parameters. The KRA showed significant, positive cor-
relations with actigraphic Fl (r= 0.43, p < 0.001), WASO (r = 0.36,
p < 0.01), and number of awakenings (r
showed negative correlations with TST (r= -0.32, p = 0.01) and SE
= 0.53, p < 0.001); but
D
f Guelph, Wiley Online Library on [02/04/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
E
S
Update:
Transcribed Image Text:w The effects of napping on night X ← ||| onlinelibrary-wiley-com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jsr.13578 The effects of napping on night-time sleep in healthy young adults evenings (short naps, n = 58; long naps, n = 57). Values are mean ± SEM 5 / 10 Total Sleep Time ( (e) ¹00 Sleep Efficiency (%) 80- Number of Awakenings 60- 40- 20- 0 (g) 50 40- 30- 20- 10- 110% + | p = 0.10 3.2.2 | The associations of napping behaviours and daytime activity with actigraphy sleep quality variables We found no significant differences in actigraphic sleep qual- ity variables by nap frequency (p > 0.05; Table S2), nap duration (p > 0.05; Figure 2a,c-g) and daytime activity levels (p > 0.05; Table 2). However, independent t tests showed that night-time sleep following late naps versus early naps had a higher actigraphic Fl (mean [SD] 28.26 [10.69] versus 23.52 [10.83], p = 0.02, d = 0.44; Figure 3a), TST (mean [SD] 7.20 [1.44] versus 6.52 [1.67] h, p=0.02, d = 0.44), SOL (mean [SD] 40.76 [45.34] versus 24.56 [26.61] min, p=0.02, d = 0.44), WASO (mean [SD] 51.59 [30.54] versus 39.01 [22.92] min, p < 0.02, d = 0.43), and number of awakenings P = 0.39 1 Sleep Onset Latency (f) 30- 20- 10- 60 40- 20- 0 F P = 0.90 -1 (mean [SD] 43.82 [14.44] versus 34.82 [13.58], p < 0.01, d = 0.46; Figure 3c,d,f,g). In contrast, SE showed no significant difference be- tween early and late naps (p = 0.053; Figure 3e). 3.3 | Correlations between night-time FI and actigraphy sleep quality variables Table 3 shows Pearson correlations between the KRA and night-time sleep quality parameters. The KRA showed significant, positive cor- relations with actigraphic Fl (r= 0.43, p < 0.001), WASO (r = 0.36, p < 0.01), and number of awakenings (r showed negative correlations with TST (r= -0.32, p = 0.01) and SE = 0.53, p < 0.001); but D f Guelph, Wiley Online Library on [02/04/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License E S Update:
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman