In the table above, are there any factors that appear to be negatively associated with disease (e.g. protective against), given the computed relative risk values? From the list below identify which of the risk factors are negatively associated with diseases. Group of answer choices Local Bushmeat Hunting Contact with Rodents Slaughtering Cows     Which of the factors in the table above appears to have the strongest positive association with disease? Group of answer choices Slaughtering Monkeys Consumption of Cooked Monkey Meat Bushmeat hunting in Odzala National Park

Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305143531
Author:CURREN
Publisher:CURREN
Chapter16: Adult And Pediatric Dosages Based On Body Surface Area
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6.1P
icon
Related questions
Question
In the table above, are there any factors that appear to be negatively associated with disease (e.g. protective against), given the computed relative risk values? From the list below identify which of the risk factors are negatively associated with diseases.
Group of answer choices
Local Bushmeat Hunting
Contact with Rodents
Slaughtering Cows
 
 
Which of the factors in the table above appears to have the strongest positive association with disease?
Group of answer choices
Slaughtering Monkeys
Consumption of Cooked Monkey Meat
Bushmeat hunting in Odzala National Park
The table provided examines various factors to determine their association with a particular observed disease, by calculating relative risk. The aim is to identify any factors that show no association (a null value of relative risk, which is close to 1) with the disease. 

### Table Breakdown:

- **Columns**:
  - **Factor**: Lists different potential risk factors.
  - **Individuals Exposed to Factor**:
    - \( n_1 \): Total number of individuals exposed to the factor.
    - \( D_1 \): Number of individuals exposed to the factor who developed the disease.
    - \( ND_1 \): Number of individuals exposed who did not develop the disease.
    - \( AP_1 \): Attack rate among exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_1/n_1 \).
  - **Individuals Not Exposed to Factor**:
    - \( n_2 \): Total number of individuals not exposed.
    - \( D_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who developed the disease.
    - \( ND_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who did not develop the disease.
    - \( AP_2 \): Attack rate among non-exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_2/n_2 \).
  - **Relative Risk**: Calculated as \( AP_1/AP_2 \).

### Highlights:

- **Drinking Well Water**: Relative Risk = 0.03
- **Slaughtering Monkeys**: Relative Risk = 100
- **Consumption of Cooked Monkey Meat**: Relative Risk = 31
- **Contact with Rodents**: Relative Risk = 1
- **Contact with Bats**: Relative Risk = 16.7
- **Sleeping Outdoors**: Relative Risk = 12.5
- **Slaughtering Cows**: Relative Risk = 0
- **Slaughtering Poultry**: Relative Risk = 4.5
- **Bushmeat Hunting (local)**: Relative Risk = 1.7
- **Bushmeat Hunting (Odzala)**: Relative Risk = 50

### Analysis:

- **No Association**: Contact with Rodents shows a relative risk of 1, indicating no association with the disease (neither positive nor negative).

### Diagram Explanation:

The table is structured to allow comparison between exposed and non-exposed groups across various potential risk factors. The key metric is the relative
Transcribed Image Text:The table provided examines various factors to determine their association with a particular observed disease, by calculating relative risk. The aim is to identify any factors that show no association (a null value of relative risk, which is close to 1) with the disease. ### Table Breakdown: - **Columns**: - **Factor**: Lists different potential risk factors. - **Individuals Exposed to Factor**: - \( n_1 \): Total number of individuals exposed to the factor. - \( D_1 \): Number of individuals exposed to the factor who developed the disease. - \( ND_1 \): Number of individuals exposed who did not develop the disease. - \( AP_1 \): Attack rate among exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_1/n_1 \). - **Individuals Not Exposed to Factor**: - \( n_2 \): Total number of individuals not exposed. - \( D_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who developed the disease. - \( ND_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who did not develop the disease. - \( AP_2 \): Attack rate among non-exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_2/n_2 \). - **Relative Risk**: Calculated as \( AP_1/AP_2 \). ### Highlights: - **Drinking Well Water**: Relative Risk = 0.03 - **Slaughtering Monkeys**: Relative Risk = 100 - **Consumption of Cooked Monkey Meat**: Relative Risk = 31 - **Contact with Rodents**: Relative Risk = 1 - **Contact with Bats**: Relative Risk = 16.7 - **Sleeping Outdoors**: Relative Risk = 12.5 - **Slaughtering Cows**: Relative Risk = 0 - **Slaughtering Poultry**: Relative Risk = 4.5 - **Bushmeat Hunting (local)**: Relative Risk = 1.7 - **Bushmeat Hunting (Odzala)**: Relative Risk = 50 ### Analysis: - **No Association**: Contact with Rodents shows a relative risk of 1, indicating no association with the disease (neither positive nor negative). ### Diagram Explanation: The table is structured to allow comparison between exposed and non-exposed groups across various potential risk factors. The key metric is the relative
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Health epidemiology
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305143531
Author:
CURREN
Publisher:
Cengage
Principles Of Radiographic Imaging: An Art And A …
Principles Of Radiographic Imaging: An Art And A …
Health & Nutrition
ISBN:
9781337711067
Author:
Richard R. Carlton, Arlene M. Adler, Vesna Balac
Publisher:
Cengage Learning