In the table above, are there any factors that appear to be negatively associated with disease (e.g. protective against), given the computed relative risk values? From the list below identify which of the risk factors are negatively associated with diseases.Group of answer choicesLocal Bushmeat HuntingContact with RodentsSlaughtering Cows Which of the factors in the table above appears to have the strongest positive association with disease?Group of answer choicesSlaughtering MonkeysConsumption of Cooked Monkey MeatBushmeat hunting in Odzala National Park The table provided examines various factors to determine their association with a particular observed disease, by calculating relative risk. The aim is to identify any factors that show no association (a null value of relative risk, which is close to 1) with the disease. ### Table Breakdown:- **Columns**: - **Factor**: Lists different potential risk factors. - **Individuals Exposed to Factor**: - \( n_1 \): Total number of individuals exposed to the factor. - \( D_1 \): Number of individuals exposed to the factor who developed the disease. - \( ND_1 \): Number of individuals exposed who did not develop the disease. - \( AP_1 \): Attack rate among exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_1/n_1 \). - **Individuals Not Exposed to Factor**: - \( n_2 \): Total number of individuals not exposed. - \( D_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who developed the disease. - \( ND_2 \): Number of individuals not exposed who did not develop the disease. - \( AP_2 \): Attack rate among non-exposed individuals, calculated as \( D_2/n_2 \). - **Relative Risk**: Calculated as \( AP_1/AP_2 \).### Highlights:- **Drinking Well Water**: Relative Risk = 0.03- **Slaughtering Monkeys**: Relative Risk = 100- **Consumption of Cooked Monkey Meat**: Relative Risk = 31- **Contact with Rodents**: Relative Risk = 1- **Contact with Bats**: Relative Risk = 16.7- **Sleeping Outdoors**: Relative Risk = 12.5- **Slaughtering Cows**: Relative Risk = 0- **Slaughtering Poultry**: Relative Risk = 4.5- **Bushmeat Hunting (local)**: Relative Risk = 1.7- **Bushmeat Hunting (Odzala)**: Relative Risk = 50### Analysis:- **No Association**: Contact with Rodents shows a relative risk of 1, indicating no association with the disease (neither positive nor negative).### Diagram Explanation:The table is structured to allow comparison between exposed and non-exposed groups across various potential risk factors. The key metric is the relative

As new illnesses appear throughout the world, there has been an upsurge in concern about the…

Answered: In the table above, are there any…

6th Edition

ISBN:9781305964792

Author:Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa

Publisher:Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa

Chapter17: Medical Coding

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CR