An operator A on a Hilbert space H over K is said to be compactif for every bounded sequence (x₂) in H, the sequence (A(x₂)) containsa subsequence which converges in H. (This definition is equivalent tothe one given earlier. See 17.1(a).)If A is a compact operator on H, then there is some a > 0 suchthat ||A(x)|| ≤ a for all x ¤ H with ||x|| ≤ 1. For otherwise, we¤can find some în € H with ||xn|| ≤ 1 and ||A(x₁)|| > n. Thenthe sequence (A(x)) has no convergent subsequence although (x₂)is a bounded sequence. This shows that every compact operator isbounded. However, the converse is not true. For example, if H isinfinite dimensional, then the identity operator I is clearly bounded,but it is not compact. For if (un) is an infinite orthonormal sequencein H, then ||un|| = 1 but ||un − Um|| = √√2 for all n ‡ m, so that thebounded sequence (I(un)) has no convergent subsequence.Requestexplain

Kindly refer to Step 2 for the solution.

An operator A on a Hilbert space H over K is said to be compact if for every bounded sequence (x₂) in H, the sequence (A(x₂)) contains a subsequence which converges in H. (This definition is equivalent to the one given earlier. See 17.1(a).) If A is a compact operator on H, then there is some a > 0 such that ||A(x)|| ≤ a for all ¤ ¤ H with ||x|| ≤ 1. For otherwise, we can find some xn ¤ H with ||xn|| ≤ 1 and ||A(x₁)|| > n. Then the sequence (A(x₂)) has no convergent subsequence although (x₂) is a bounded sequence. This shows that every compact operator is bounded. However, the converse is not true. For example, if H is infinite dimensional, then the identity operator I is clearly bounded, but it is not compact. For if (un) is an infinite orthonormal sequence in H, then ||un|| = 1 but ||un − Um|| = √√2 for all n ‡ m, so that the bounded sequence (I(un)) has no convergent subsequence. - Request explain

An operator A on a Hilbert space H over K is said to be compact if for every bounded sequence (x₂) in H, the sequence (A(x₂)) contains a subsequence which converges in H. (This definition is equivalent to the one given earlier. See 17.1(a).) If A is a compact operator on H, then there is some a > 0 such that ||A(x)|| ≤ a for all ¤ ¤ H with ||x|| ≤ 1. For otherwise, we can find some xn ¤ H with ||xn|| ≤ 1 and ||A(x₁)|| > n. Then the sequence (A(x₂)) has no convergent subsequence although (x₂) is a bounded sequence. This shows that every compact operator is bounded. However, the converse is not true. For example, if H is infinite dimensional, then the identity operator I is clearly bounded, but it is not compact. For if (un) is an infinite orthonormal sequence in H, then ||un|| = 1 but ||un − Um|| = √√2 for all n ‡ m, so that the bounded sequence (I(un)) has no convergent subsequence. - Request explain

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

10th Edition

ISBN:9780470458365

Author:Erwin Kreyszig

Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig

Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Define P(n) = [p(d), din were (n) is the Euler o function (that is, p(n) is the number of integers k such that Isk≤n and ged(k,n) = 1). (a) Show that if p is prime, (p) = p. (b) Show that if m and n are relatively prime, (mn) = (m)(n). (Hint: you may use without proof the fact that has the same property, and the fact that the divisors of mn are exactly the products kl where klm and In).
Consider the function f.NxN-N defined recursively by: 1) Base case: Let meN and define (0,m) = 0 2) Recursive case: For any x,meN, x>0, define f(x,m) = f(x-1,m) + (m+m) Prove the following theorem holds using proof by induction: Thereom: For any n,meN, m>0 we have (n.m)I m = n+n Fill in v our answer here
4 Define a function S : Z+ → Z+ as follows. For each positive integer n, let S(n) = the sum of the positive divisors of n. a. S(1) = b. S(4) =
Define μ ∗ on the power set of R byμ∗(A) = (0 if A is bounded,1 if A is unbounded. Is μ∗ an outer measure or not? (Prove your claim.)
Prove the theorem
Asap
Exercise 3.2.13: Let f: S→R be a function and c = S, such that for every sequence {xn} in S with lim x₁ = C, the sequence {f(xn)} converges. Show that f is continuous at c.
As an example of an inner product space that is not a Hilbert space, consider the linear space C[a, b] (Example 1.2) with inner product of f, g e C[a, b] defined to be (f, g) = f*ƒ(x)g(x) dx. If a sequence of functions from C[a, b], {f} converges with respect to the norm defined by this inner product, they will only converge "in the mean!" Since mean convergence does not necessarily imply uniform convergence it is seen that this spaces does not have to be complete and the counterexample Example 4.4) shows that this is actually so. • Request explain which is this norm? Request explain with example
#5
Material :Daly analysis
Complete the proof for Theorem 7.
Prove that if K <H <G then [G: K] = [G: H] [H: K].