In the context of a case-control study, a pro of recruiting incident cases rather than prevalent cases is: a. Incidence is easier to assess than prevalence b. Incidence provides a measure of the burden of disease at one “snapshot” in time c. Using incident cases allows researchers to account for case-deaths that would not be evident if only prevalent cases were considered d. None of the above
In the context of a case-control study, a pro of recruiting incident cases rather than prevalent cases is: a. Incidence is easier to assess than prevalence b. Incidence provides a measure of the burden of disease at one “snapshot” in time c. Using incident cases allows researchers to account for case-deaths that would not be evident if only prevalent cases were considered d. None of the above
Related questions
Question
In the context of a case-control study, a pro of recruiting incident cases rather than prevalent cases is:
a. Incidence is easier to assess than prevalence
b. Incidence provides a measure of the burden of disease at one “snapshot” in time
c. Using incident cases allows researchers to account for case-deaths that would not be evident if only prevalent cases were considered
d. None of the above
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"