In his 2007 article, "Saving Afghanistan," Barnett Rubin argues that "Washington should reverse the Bush administration's policy of linking as many local conflicts as possible to the global 'war on terror' and instead address each on its own terms." With respect to Pakistan, what would such a policy imply?
In his 2007 article, "Saving Afghanistan," Barnett Rubin argues that "Washington should reverse the Bush administration's policy of linking as many local conflicts as possible to the global 'war on terror' and instead address each on its own terms." With respect to Pakistan, what would such a policy imply?
Related questions
Question
In his 2007 article, "Saving Afghanistan," Barnett Rubin argues that "Washington should reverse the Bush administration's policy of linking as many local conflicts as possible to the global 'war on terror' and instead address each on its own terms." With respect to Pakistan, what would such a policy imply?
A. Making clear to the Pakistani government that it can no longer sit on the fence and expect to the U.S. to turn a blind to its support of the Taliban but rather must support U.S. policy in its locality.
B. Recognizing Pakistan's own security interests and concerns vis-a-vis India and Afghanistan and making efforts to address those issues.
C. A transfer of the monies and arms necessary for Pakistan to exert effective control over its borders with Afghanistan.
D. Ignoring the Pakistani government's objections to U.S. operations argainst targets in Pakistan. If Pakistanis are unwilling or unable to take of it, the U.S. will do it for them.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
