In a test of the hypotheses Ho: M1 = 2 versus Ha: μ₁ μ2 where μ = population mean average blood sugar level of patients for two different treatments, the P- value is 0.0156. Which of the following is the appropriate interpretation of the P-value? If it were true that the population mean blood sugar level of the two treatments are different, then we would see sample results such as these or more extreme 1.56% of the time. If it were true that the population mean blood sugar level of the two treatments are equal, then we would see sample results such as these or more extreme 1.56% of the time. Since the P-value (0.0156) is less than 0.05 we would reject the null and say that there is significant evidence at the 5%-level to say that the means for these two treatments would be different. There is a 1.56% chance that the population mean blood sugar levels for the two treatments are equal. Since the P-value (0.0156) is greater than 0.01 we would fail to reject the null and say that there is not significant evidence at the 1%-level to say that the means for these two treatments would be different.
In a test of the hypotheses Ho: M1 = 2 versus Ha: μ₁ μ2 where μ = population mean average blood sugar level of patients for two different treatments, the P- value is 0.0156. Which of the following is the appropriate interpretation of the P-value? If it were true that the population mean blood sugar level of the two treatments are different, then we would see sample results such as these or more extreme 1.56% of the time. If it were true that the population mean blood sugar level of the two treatments are equal, then we would see sample results such as these or more extreme 1.56% of the time. Since the P-value (0.0156) is less than 0.05 we would reject the null and say that there is significant evidence at the 5%-level to say that the means for these two treatments would be different. There is a 1.56% chance that the population mean blood sugar levels for the two treatments are equal. Since the P-value (0.0156) is greater than 0.01 we would fail to reject the null and say that there is not significant evidence at the 1%-level to say that the means for these two treatments would be different.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Please help it’s not graded
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman