In a survey of 2055 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic uncertainty, 59% thought that wages paid to workers in industry were too low. The marginthrough (d) below, which represent a reasonable interpretation of the survey results? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw.error was 3 percentage points with 95% confidence. For parts (a)O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.(b) We are 92% to 98% confident 59% of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.Is the interpretation reasonable?O A. The interpretation is reasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.(c) We are 95% confident that the interval from 0.56 to 0.62 contains the true proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low.Is the interpretation reasonable?O A. The interpretation is reasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.(d) In 95% of samples of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty, the proportion who believed wages paid to workersindustry were too low is between 0.56 and 0.62.Is the interpretation reasonable?The interpretationreasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.O c. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not trueO Time Remaining: 02:21:03NextMacBook ProG Search or type URLesc&@%3D45678123QWERT.Y In a survey of 2055 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic uncertainty, 59% thought that wages paid to workers in industry were too low. The margin of error was 3 percentage points with 95% confidence. For parts (a)through (d) below, which represent a reasonable interpretation of the survey results? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw.(a) We are 95% confident 59% of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.Is the interpretation reasonable?O A. The interpretation is reasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.OC. The interpretationflawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.(b) We are 92% to 98% confident 59% of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workersindustry were too low.Is the interpretation reasonable?O A. The interpretation is reasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.(c) We are 95% confident that the interval from 0.56 to 0.62 contains the true proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low.Is the interpretation reasonable?O A. The interpretation is reasonable.O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.(d) In 95% of samples of adults in the country during the periodeconomic uncertainty, the proportion who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low is between 0.56 and 0.62.Is the interpretation reasonable?The interpretation is rAASonableO Time Remaining: 02:21:25NextMacBook ProG Search or type URLくescそ%23$&123478%3DdeletQWYtab11K...しのつトR

Since you have posted a question with multiple subparts, we will solve first three subparts for you. To get remaining subparts solved, please repost the question and mention the subparts to be solved. Confidence interval are used to understand the interval range that provide the true value of the parameter. It is the combined value of the sample statistic and the margin of error. Where margin of error is the combined value of critical value and the standard error. It is calculated for proportion denoted as : p^±zα×p^1-p^nGiven : In the survey of 2055 adults of economical uncertainty , where 59% wages paid to workers in the industry is too low The margin error is 3 percentage at 95% confidence. a) The 59% of the wages paid to workers in the industry is too low at 95% confidence interval is flawed, hence interval is not denoted. Hence Option D is correct. Incorrect options : Option A - Interpretation is not reasonable Option B - Level of confidence is not varies Option C - The interval is not standard for all the other intervalb) The confidence interval at 92% to 98% confident is 59% of the wages paid to workers in the industry is too low. Where the interpretation is wrong, since the confidence interval is different for various level of significance. Hence Option D is correct. Incorrect options : Option A - Interpretation is not reasonable Option B - Interval does not provided is not the correct reason for flaw Option C - It has no confidence interval that is not true c) The confidence interval at 95% : CI=p±MOE=0.59±0.03=0.59-0.03,0.59+0.03=0.56,0.62 Here the wages paid to workers in the industry is too low lies in the confidence interval 0.56 and 0.62. It is the reasonable interpretation. Hence option A is correct. Incorrect options : Option B - It has no confidence interval that is not true Option C - Confidence interval are varying is not the correct reason Option D - No interval provided is not the correct reason

Math

Statistics

In a survey of 2055 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic uncertainty, 59% thought that wages paid to workers in industry were too low. The margin of error was 3 percentage points with 95% confidence. For parts (a) through (d) below, which represent a reasonable interpretation of the survey results? For those that are not reasonable, explain the flaw. (a) We are 95% confident 59% of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable? O A. The interpretation is reasonable. O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying. O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true. OD. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion. (b) We are 92% to 98% confident 59% of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable? O A. The interpretation is reasonable. O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion. OC. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true. O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying. (c) We are 95% confident that the interval from 0.56 to 0.62 contains the true proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable? OA. The interpretation is reasonable. O B. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true. O C. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying. O D. The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation provides no interval about the population proportion.