In 2014, Apple reported profits of more than $50 billion on sales of $182 billion. For that same period, Microsoft posted a profit of almost $30 billion on sales of $88 billion. So Apple is a better marketer, right? Sales and profits provide information to com- pare the profitability of these two competitors, but between these numbers is information regarding the efficiency of marketing efforts in creating those sales and profits. Appendix 3, Marketing by the Numbers, discusses other marketing profitability mea- sures beyond the return on marketing investment (marketing ROI) measure described in this chapter. Review the Appendix 2 to answer the questions using the following information from the two companies' incomes statements (all numbers are in thousands): Apple Microsoft Sales $182,795,000 $86,833,000 Gross Profit $70,537,000 $59,899,000 Marketing Expenses $8,994,750 $15,474,000 Net Income (Profit) $52,503,000 $27,759,000 2-14. Go to Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/) and find the income statements for two other compet- ing companies. Perform the same analyses for these companies that you performed for the previous ques- tion. Which company is doing better overall and with respect to marketing? For marketing expenses, use 75 percent of the company's reported "Selling General and Administrative" expenses, as not all of the expenses in that category are marketing expenses.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
In 2014, Apple reported profits of more than $50 billion on sales
of $182 billion. For that same period, Microsoft posted a profit
of almost $30 billion on sales of $88 billion. So Apple is a better
marketer, right? Sales and profits provide information to com-
pare the profitability of these two competitors, but between these
numbers is information regarding the efficiency of marketing
efforts in creating those sales and profits. Appendix 3, Marketing
by the Numbers, discusses other marketing profitability mea-
sures beyond the return on marketing investment (marketing
ROI) measure described in this chapter. Review the Appendix
2 to answer the questions using the following information from
the two companies' incomes statements (all numbers are in
thousands):
Apple
Microsoft
Sales
$182,795,000
$86,833,000
Gross Profit
$70,537,000
$59,899,000
Marketing Expenses
$8,994,750
$15,474,000
Net Income (Profit)
$52,503,000
$27,759,000
Transcribed Image Text:In 2014, Apple reported profits of more than $50 billion on sales of $182 billion. For that same period, Microsoft posted a profit of almost $30 billion on sales of $88 billion. So Apple is a better marketer, right? Sales and profits provide information to com- pare the profitability of these two competitors, but between these numbers is information regarding the efficiency of marketing efforts in creating those sales and profits. Appendix 3, Marketing by the Numbers, discusses other marketing profitability mea- sures beyond the return on marketing investment (marketing ROI) measure described in this chapter. Review the Appendix 2 to answer the questions using the following information from the two companies' incomes statements (all numbers are in thousands): Apple Microsoft Sales $182,795,000 $86,833,000 Gross Profit $70,537,000 $59,899,000 Marketing Expenses $8,994,750 $15,474,000 Net Income (Profit) $52,503,000 $27,759,000
2-14. Go to Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/)
and find the income statements for two other compet-
ing companies. Perform the same analyses for these
companies that you performed for the previous ques-
tion. Which company is doing better overall and with
respect to marketing? For marketing expenses, use 75
percent of the company's reported "Selling General and
Administrative" expenses, as not all of the expenses in
that category are marketing expenses.
Transcribed Image Text:2-14. Go to Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/) and find the income statements for two other compet- ing companies. Perform the same analyses for these companies that you performed for the previous ques- tion. Which company is doing better overall and with respect to marketing? For marketing expenses, use 75 percent of the company's reported "Selling General and Administrative" expenses, as not all of the expenses in that category are marketing expenses.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Strategic business units
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education