In 1857, Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote, "(black people) are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States." This is from the Dred Scott decision. Was Taney wrong about the intent of the "founding fathers"?
In 1857, Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote, "(black people) are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States." This is from the Dred Scott decision. Was Taney wrong about the intent of the "founding fathers"?
Related questions
Question
In 1857, Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote, "(black people) are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States."
This is from the Dred Scott decision. Was Taney wrong about the intent of the "founding fathers"?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
