I need to give two examples of KAY programs with errors that are neither detected during the lexical analysis nor during the syntactic analysis. But I have no idea what that means or how to do that. Can someone help me please?

What would occur if programming principles were recorded in writing? How many various paradigms are truly necessary? Do we really need to confirm their presence? Engage in a thorough discussion and back up your assertions with your own words.

Is so-called good grammar necessary in the English-speaking world today?  If so, why?  If not, why not? Of the three articles above, which did you like best?  Which was the most interesting?  Why? Do you think that the rules of grammar and punctuation are changing in the world today?  How?  Why? Are there particular rules that you think we really need?  Are there ones you think should go? Write 250-400 words in total, and then comment on at least one other post.

Detail how you would go about adding reserved words into the problem where you are designing your own lexical analyzer? How would you have to change your code? What would you have to add to let users choose a reserve word word as an identifier?

Is a list of programming paradigms available? So why are there such a wide variety of paradigms? Are they truly necessary? Your opinions should be expressed in your own words.

What if you wrote down the programming paradigms? For how many paradigms do we really need? Is it truly necessary to have them? Discuss in depth, constructing your own words to back up your points.

Does each programming paradigm have a distinct advantage or disadvantage over another? In light of this, why are there so many diverse paradigms in the world? Is it absolutely necessary that they exist? Using your own words to express your views is the finest method to get your point across.

We often evaluate languages based on the programs we see, but that is often misleading. How could the evaluation of a program written in a programming language differ from the evaluation of the programming language according to criteria for evaluating a programming language? In your answer, make sure to discuss at least two criteria for evaluating a programming language.

OBJECTIVE:Design a lexical analyzer for given language and the lexical analyzer should ignore redundant spaces, tabs and new lines. It should also ignore comments. Although the syntax specification states that identifiers can be arbitrarily long, you may restrict the length to some reasonable value. Simulate the same in C language.  PROGRAM LOGIC:   Read the input Expression       2.  Check whether input is alphabet or digits then store it as identifier       3.  If the input is is operator store it as symbol      4. Check the input for keywords     Thanks a lot in advance :)

Why don't we have a look at the many programming approaches that are currently at our disposal? There are numerous. The question that has to be posed in this situation is, "What factors contribute to the existence of a plethora of distinct paradigms?" Are you left with no other option than to have them? It would be helpful if you could describe it using your own words. I would appreciate that.