How have partisanship & ideologically driven judicial appointments translated into accelerating tensions between notions of judicial activism & judicial restraint [briefly explain the terms], cite at least six cases to illustrate how SCOTUS expanded civil rights during the 20th century after often circumscribing them in the 19th century [cite one restraint & briefly explaining how the "incorporation doctrine" applies], & conclude by explaining how Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission [2010] has impacted the nation's politics?

icon
Related questions
Question
How have partisanship & ideologically driven judicial appointments translated into accelerating
tensions between notions of judicial activism & judicial restraint [briefly explain the terms], cite at
least six cases to illustrate how SCOTUS expanded civil rights during the 20th century after often
circumscribing them in the 19th century [cite one restraint & briefly explaining how the
"incorporation doctrine" applies], & conclude by explaining how Citizens United v. Federal Elections
Commission [2010] has impacted the nation's politics?
Transcribed Image Text:How have partisanship & ideologically driven judicial appointments translated into accelerating tensions between notions of judicial activism & judicial restraint [briefly explain the terms], cite at least six cases to illustrate how SCOTUS expanded civil rights during the 20th century after often circumscribing them in the 19th century [cite one restraint & briefly explaining how the "incorporation doctrine" applies], & conclude by explaining how Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission [2010] has impacted the nation's politics?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer