How does Ibsen’s portrayal of bourgeois marriage compare to Sarah Stickney Ellis and Emmeline Pankhurst’s views of marriage and gender roles in Industrial Society? [You can also bring in the analysis of the propaganda posters to augment your argument]. In what ways might the limitations placed on women—of which Pankhurst makes mention, and which Ellis finds to be proper—lead to the central conflicts in the play? How did bourgeois gender expectations complicate “real-life” situations? What choices did women really have? How might their decisions have affected women and their families?
Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House, sparked a good deal of controversy in late 19th century European society. Ibsen defended himself (and the controversial ending of his play) by stating that he was simply observing societal institutions, not critiquing them. For the purposes of this paper, we will take Ibsen at his word, and accept the picture the play paints of late 19th-century bourgeois society, marriage, and men’s and women’s roles as accurate.
How does Ibsen’s portrayal of bourgeois marriage compare to Sarah Stickney Ellis and Emmeline Pankhurst’s views of marriage and gender roles in Industrial Society? [You can also bring in the analysis of the propaganda posters to augment your argument]. In what ways might the limitations placed on women—of which Pankhurst makes mention, and which Ellis finds to be proper—lead to the central conflicts in the play? How did bourgeois gender expectations complicate “real-life” situations? What choices did women really have? How might their decisions have affected women and their families?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
