Answered: How do stare decisis and legal…

How do stare decisis and legal reasoning relate to each other? When is the Supreme Court justified in not following the doctrine of stare decisis

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter2: Choice In A World Of Scarcity

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18RQ: What are four responses to the claim that people should not behave in the way described in this...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

3.
a. The action of the British government during the Opium War is an example of unilateral political action. How can you apply the Realistic Analytical perspective to explain why the drug lords of Central and Latin America have not applied similar action to impose the sale of illicit drugs in the USA b Describe at least two medicinal and or domestic or economic uses of opium and opium derivatives in 18th and 19th Century England among the working class. Please provide examples of any of the uses and their consequences and explain why did these uses of opium lead to changes in legislation regarding oplum? c. What would you apply the theory of Historical Materialism to explain the working class addiction to opium in 19th Century England?
What are four responses to the claim that people should not behave in the way described in this chapter?
Adam Smith proposed taxing ‘Sugar, rum and tobacco’ because they are: “nowhere necessaries of life” “objects of almost universal consumption” Why do you think Adam Smith preferred to impose a tax on luxury goods? Why do you think Adam Smith preferred a tax on ‘objects of almost universal consumption’? Note that ‘Smith’s proposal to tax sugar was not aimed at improving health’ Requirement: Demonstrate a precise understanding of Adam Smith’s meaning and intent, with the appropriate link to relevant economic concepts.
Explain the difference between a trial court and an appellate court. How do the cases differ at the trial level and at the appellate level? How do the judges differ at the trial level and at the appellate level? How do we know if the outcome of a court decision is binding authority?
4. No one has anything to fear from giving the police random stop-and-search powers so long as they have nothing to hide. If you are carrying a knife or gun or stolen goods, then of course it’s a different story. Opponents of the bill to grant the police more wide-ranging powers can only be helping to protect the guilty. Summarize this passage in12 words? Is it an argument? If so, what is its conclusion? If it isn’t an argument, why isn’t it?
3. In the Supreme Court case involving Charles Schenck, which tested the constitutionality of the Esplonage Act, the Supreme Court decided that Multiple Choice the right to criticize government was a fundamental civil liberty that could not be infringed upon even in times of war. the Constitution's guarantee of free speech was applicable only to speech that could be conclusively proven to be true. freedom of speech could be curtailed if the words produced a "clear and present danger." freedom of speech could be curtailed if the speech tended to encourage pernicious actions. although the government could issue injunctions to prevent the media from printing materials that threatened national security, it could not punish them after the materials had been published.
What is the example Coase uses in his examples of liability and no liability for damages?
2. The purpose of an ordeal mechanisms is to separate those who truly need assistance fromthose who can support themselves. True, False, or Uncertain? Support your answer with anexplanation (one to two sentences) or a diagram.
PLEASE CHECK THIS HOW TO SOLVE PLEASE TEACH EXPLAIN STEP BY STEP
Government action is based on majority rule, whereas mar- Ket action is based on mutual consent. The market allows for proportional representation of minontes. but minorities must yield to the views ol the majonty when acuviles are undertaken through government." In your own words, explain the meanine of this statement. Is the statement true? Why or why not
A familiar example of a negative externality is traffic congestion. In principle, it should be possible to internalize this externality by permitting drivers to negotiate about rights to drive during particular time periods. The most likely reason that this does NOT happen is that: Select one: O a Most individuals are unfamiliar with the Coase Theorem Ob. Lawyers would find a way to prohibit such negotiations unless they were actively involved, and this would make transaction costs prohibitive c.Any agreements arising from such negotiations could not be enforced, since the constitution guarantees all individuals freedom of access to all public roads d. The transactions costs associated with identifying and establishing communication among the interested parties would be prohibitive