How did Justice Robert Jackson compare a military order to a court decision in the case of Korematsu v. United States? He argued that a judicial decision lasts longer than a military order and decides the extent of the Constitution. He argued that military orders were more important and urgent than court decisions. He believed military orders and judicial decisions were equally important. He considered that citizens were obliged to comply with court orders in the same way that soldiers followed their superiors. He believed there was no valid point of comparison between the two because they applied to different jurisdictions.

How did Justice Robert Jackson compare a military order to a court decision in the case of Korematsu v. United States? He argued that a judicial decision lasts longer than a military order and decides the extent of the Constitution. He argued that military orders were more important and urgent than court decisions. He believed military orders and judicial decisions were equally important. He considered that citizens were obliged to comply with court orders in the same way that soldiers followed their superiors. He believed there was no valid point of comparison between the two because they applied to different jurisdictions.