Nowhere in the 4th Amendment does it state that evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment must be excluded or suppressed from use by the government in any criminal prosecution. Is this the best way to remedy violations of the 4th Amendment. Clearly its application allows for defendants that are guilty to be able to avoid justice when the exclusion of evidence occurs. What other method could be used to protect the rights under the 4th Amendment? Isn't it essential that law enforcement has to obey the law С
Nowhere in the 4th Amendment does it state that evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment must be excluded or suppressed from use by the government in any criminal prosecution. Is this the best way to remedy violations of the 4th Amendment. Clearly its application allows for defendants that are guilty to be able to avoid justice when the exclusion of evidence occurs. What other method could be used to protect the rights under the 4th Amendment? Isn't it essential that law enforcement has to obey the law С
Related questions
Question
100%
Transcribed Image Text:Nowhere in the 4th Amendment does it state
that evidence seized in violation of the 4th
Amendment must be excluded or suppressed
from use by the government in any criminal
prosecution. Is this the best way to remedy
violations of the 4th Amendment. Clearly its
application allows for defendants that are
guilty to be able to avoid justice when the
exclusion of evidence occurs. What other
method could be used to protect the rights
under the 4th Amendment? Isn't it essential
that law enforcement has to obey the law
С
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
