hat is Justice Taney’s decision in you
Related questions
Question
What is Justice Taney’s decision in your own words?
This is history, Dred Scot Case (1857).
![Decision Delivered by Chief Justice Taney
[1] It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the
Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other;
it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity [future generations], but for no one else...according to the
provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded...it gave to each citizen rights and privileges
outside of his State which he did not before possess, and placed him in every other State upon a perfect equality with
its own citizens as to rights of person and rights of property; it made him a citizen of the United States…..
[2] In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of
Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants,
whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people...
[3] And upon a full and careful consideration of the subject, the court is of opinion, that, upon the facts stated...Dred
Scott was not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States, and not entitled as such
to sue in its courts...neither Dred Scott himself, nor any of his family, were made free by being carried into this territory;
even if they had been carried there by the owner, with the intention of becoming a permanent resident ...](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F7c6a3dff-6729-485c-933e-bf615eefedb6%2F2fb25839-b8e1-4435-ba2a-873314432369%2Fc9ejndk_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Decision Delivered by Chief Justice Taney
[1] It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the
Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other;
it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity [future generations], but for no one else...according to the
provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded...it gave to each citizen rights and privileges
outside of his State which he did not before possess, and placed him in every other State upon a perfect equality with
its own citizens as to rights of person and rights of property; it made him a citizen of the United States…..
[2] In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of
Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants,
whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people...
[3] And upon a full and careful consideration of the subject, the court is of opinion, that, upon the facts stated...Dred
Scott was not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States, and not entitled as such
to sue in its courts...neither Dred Scott himself, nor any of his family, were made free by being carried into this territory;
even if they had been carried there by the owner, with the intention of becoming a permanent resident ...
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
