Groups: 1 = 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 Years, 3= 60-92 Years. What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 1? Group of answer choices: 1. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2 2. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 2 or 3 3. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2 but does not differ in FIQ from Group 3 3. Group 1 does not differ in FIQ from Group 2 but has significantly lower FIQ than Group 3 4. None of the above   What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 2? Group of answer choices: 1. Group 2 does not differ in FIQ from Group 1 but has significantly lower FIQ than Group 3 2. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1 but does not differ in FIQ from Group 3 3. Group 2 does not differ in FIQ from Groups 1 or 3 4. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1 5. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 1 or 3 6. None of the above   What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 3? Group of answer choices: 1. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2 2. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 1 or 2 3. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1 but does not differ in 4. FIQ from Group 2 5. Group 3 does not differ in FIQ from Groups 1 or 2 6. None of the above

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Groups: 1 = 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 Years, 3= 60-92 Years.
What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 1?
Group of answer choices:
1. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2
2. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 2 or 3
3. Group 1 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2 but does not differ in FIQ from Group 3
3. Group 1 does not differ in FIQ from Group 2 but has significantly lower FIQ than Group 3
4. None of the above
 
What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 2?
Group of answer choices:
1. Group 2 does not differ in FIQ from Group 1 but has significantly lower FIQ than Group 3
2. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1 but does not differ in FIQ from Group 3
3. Group 2 does not differ in FIQ from Groups 1 or 3
4. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1
5. Group 2 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 1 or 3
6. None of the above
 
What does Tukey’s HSD testing reveal about Group 3?
Group of answer choices:
1. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 2
2. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Groups 1 or 2
3. Group 3 has significantly higher FIQ than Group 1 but does not differ in 4. FIQ from Group 2
5. Group 3 does not differ in FIQ from Groups 1 or 2
6. None of the above
Oneway
Post Hoc Tests
Descriptives
Multiple Comparisons
WAIS-R full scale IQ
Dependent Variable: WAIS-R full scale IQ
95% Confidence Interval for
Tukey HSD
Mean
Mean
Difference (I-
J)
95% Confidence Interval
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Minimum
Maximum
5-25 Years
185
107.15
11.946
.878
105.41
108.88
77
146
(1) Subjects age in years
(J) Subiects age in years
Std. Error
Sig.
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
26-59 Years
380
108.40
12.840
.659
107.11
109.70
73
150
5-25 Years
26-59 Years
-1.257
1.115
.497
-3.87
1.36
60-92 Years
185
112.40
12.052
.886
110.65
114.15
81
143
60-92 Years
-5.254
1.293
<.001
-8.29
-2.22
Total
750
109.08
12.572
.459
108.18
109.98
73
150
26-59 Years
5-25 Years
1.257
1.115
.497
-1.36
3.87
60-92 Years
-3.997"
1.115
.001
-6.61
-1.38
60-92 Years
5-25 Years
5.254
1.293
<.001
2.22
8.29
ANOVA
26-59 Years
3.997
1.115
.001
1.38
6.61
WAIS-R full scale IQ
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
2905.502
2
1452.751
9.398
<.001
Homogeneous Subsets
Within Groups
115472.857
747
154.582
Total
118378.359
749
WAIS-R full scale IQ
Tukey HSDa.b
ANOVA Effect Sizes
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Subjects age in years
N
1
2
95% Confidence Interval
Point
Estimate
Lower
Upper
5-25 Years
185
107.15
WAIS-R full scale IQ Eta-squared
108.40
26-59 Years
380
.025
.006
.049
60-92 Years
185
112.40
Epsilon-squared
.022
.004
.046
Omega-squared Fixed-
.022
.004
.046
Sig.
.534
1.000
effect
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 223.175.
Omega-squared
Random-effect
.011
.002
.024
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of
the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not
guaranteed.
a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.
Transcribed Image Text:Oneway Post Hoc Tests Descriptives Multiple Comparisons WAIS-R full scale IQ Dependent Variable: WAIS-R full scale IQ 95% Confidence Interval for Tukey HSD Mean Mean Difference (I- J) 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum 5-25 Years 185 107.15 11.946 .878 105.41 108.88 77 146 (1) Subjects age in years (J) Subiects age in years Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound 26-59 Years 380 108.40 12.840 .659 107.11 109.70 73 150 5-25 Years 26-59 Years -1.257 1.115 .497 -3.87 1.36 60-92 Years 185 112.40 12.052 .886 110.65 114.15 81 143 60-92 Years -5.254 1.293 <.001 -8.29 -2.22 Total 750 109.08 12.572 .459 108.18 109.98 73 150 26-59 Years 5-25 Years 1.257 1.115 .497 -1.36 3.87 60-92 Years -3.997" 1.115 .001 -6.61 -1.38 60-92 Years 5-25 Years 5.254 1.293 <.001 2.22 8.29 ANOVA 26-59 Years 3.997 1.115 .001 1.38 6.61 WAIS-R full scale IQ *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 2905.502 2 1452.751 9.398 <.001 Homogeneous Subsets Within Groups 115472.857 747 154.582 Total 118378.359 749 WAIS-R full scale IQ Tukey HSDa.b ANOVA Effect Sizes Subset for alpha = 0.05 Subjects age in years N 1 2 95% Confidence Interval Point Estimate Lower Upper 5-25 Years 185 107.15 WAIS-R full scale IQ Eta-squared 108.40 26-59 Years 380 .025 .006 .049 60-92 Years 185 112.40 Epsilon-squared .022 .004 .046 Omega-squared Fixed- .022 .004 .046 Sig. .534 1.000 effect Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 223.175. Omega-squared Random-effect .011 .002 .024 b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman