(b) Approximate to the nearest whole number (in thousands of metric tons) the change in the yearly carbon dioxide emission from 2016 to 2023. thousand metric tons (c) Which of the two graphs is more likely to be misleading? Why? (Choose the best answer.) In Graph A, the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission are exaggerated. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the baseline is at 0, which exaggerates the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the baseline is at 98 instead of 0, so the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was smaller than it really was. Graph A and Graph B both show the carbon dioxide emission, in thousands of metric tons, from a local power plant for the years 2016 through 2023. (B graphs show exactly the same data.) 110 100 90. 80 70 60 50. 40 30. 20. 10. Graph A Carbon dioxide emission (in thousands of metric tons) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 110 108 106 104 102 100 Graph B Carbon dioxide emission (in thousands of metric tons) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

College Algebra
1st Edition
ISBN:9781938168383
Author:Jay Abramson
Publisher:Jay Abramson
Chapter6: Exponential And Logarithmic Functions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 33PT: Enter the data from Table 2 into a graphing calculator and graph the ranking scatter plot. Determine...
icon
Related questions
Question
(b)Approximate to the nearest whole number (in thousands of metric tons) the change in the yearly carbon dioxide emission from 2016 to 2023.
 
(b) Approximate to the nearest whole number (in thousands of metric tons) the change in the yearly carbon dioxide
emission from 2016 to 2023.
thousand metric tons
(c) Which of the two graphs is more likely to be misleading? Why? (Choose the best answer.)
In Graph A, the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. In
Graph B, the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission are exaggerated. Therefore, Graph B could
mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was
larger than it really was.
In Graph A, the baseline is at 0, which exaggerates the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In
Graph B, the baseline is at 98 instead of 0, so the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels
of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of
carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was.
In Graph A, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of
carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a
relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into
thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really
was.
In Graph A, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the
levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a
dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking
that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was smaller than it really was.
Transcribed Image Text:(b) Approximate to the nearest whole number (in thousands of metric tons) the change in the yearly carbon dioxide emission from 2016 to 2023. thousand metric tons (c) Which of the two graphs is more likely to be misleading? Why? (Choose the best answer.) In Graph A, the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission are exaggerated. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the baseline is at 0, which exaggerates the differences between the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the baseline is at 98 instead of 0, so the points are at heights of the same relative size as the actual levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph B could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was larger than it really was. In Graph A, the points look to be at very different heights, which suggests there was a relatively small decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. In Graph B, the points look to be at similar heights, suggesting that there was a dramatic decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission. Therefore, Graph A could mislead a person into thinking that the decrease in the levels of carbon dioxide emission between 2016 and 2023 was smaller than it really was.
Graph A and Graph B both show the carbon dioxide emission, in thousands of metric tons, from a local power plant for the years 2016 through 2023. (B
graphs show exactly the same data.)
110
100
90.
80
70
60
50.
40
30.
20.
10.
Graph A
Carbon dioxide emission
(in thousands of metric tons)
2016
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
110
108
106
104
102
100
Graph B
Carbon dioxide emission
(in thousands of metric tons)
2016 2017
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Transcribed Image Text:Graph A and Graph B both show the carbon dioxide emission, in thousands of metric tons, from a local power plant for the years 2016 through 2023. (B graphs show exactly the same data.) 110 100 90. 80 70 60 50. 40 30. 20. 10. Graph A Carbon dioxide emission (in thousands of metric tons) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 110 108 106 104 102 100 Graph B Carbon dioxide emission (in thousands of metric tons) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305658004
Author:
Ron Larson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning