Given the graphs below, which material has the higher spring constant? Hooke's Law Experiment 1 20 y 2.0583x+0.2 (Equation 3) 18 16 y= 1.5583x+ 1.375 (Equation 2) 14 12 • Material 1 10 I Material 2 Line ar (Material 1) 6. Line ar (Material 2) 4. 10 Apllied Force Newtons Deformation mm

College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
icon
Related questions
Question
Can you please answer to those pratique questions and explain ?
**Educational Website Transcription: Hooke's Law Experiment 1**

---

**Title: Hooke's Law Experiment 1**

**Question:**
Given the graphs below, which material has the higher spring constant?

**Graph Details:**

The graph presents data from Hooke's Law Experiment 1, showcasing the relationship between applied force (in Newtons) and deformation (in millimeters) for two different materials.

- **Axes:**
  - The x-axis represents the "Applied Force in Newtons" ranging from 0 to 10.
  - The y-axis represents "Deformation in mm" ranging from 0 to 20.

- **Data Representation:**
  - **Material 1** is shown with blue diamonds and a corresponding linear trend line.
  - **Material 2** is shown with red squares and its own linear trend line.

- **Equations:**
  - The linear equation for **Material 1** is \( y = 1.5583x + 1.375 \) (Equation 2). This represents the deformation for Material 1 under applied force.
  - The linear equation for **Material 2** is \( y = 2.0583x + 0.2 \) (Equation 3), indicating the deformation for Material 2.

**Analysis:**
- The slope of the line indicates the spring constant for each material.
- Material 2, with a slope of 2.0583, has a higher spring constant compared to Material 1, which has a slope of 1.5583.

**Conclusion:**
Material 2 exhibits a higher spring constant, indicating that it is stiffer compared to Material 1 under similar force conditions.
Transcribed Image Text:**Educational Website Transcription: Hooke's Law Experiment 1** --- **Title: Hooke's Law Experiment 1** **Question:** Given the graphs below, which material has the higher spring constant? **Graph Details:** The graph presents data from Hooke's Law Experiment 1, showcasing the relationship between applied force (in Newtons) and deformation (in millimeters) for two different materials. - **Axes:** - The x-axis represents the "Applied Force in Newtons" ranging from 0 to 10. - The y-axis represents "Deformation in mm" ranging from 0 to 20. - **Data Representation:** - **Material 1** is shown with blue diamonds and a corresponding linear trend line. - **Material 2** is shown with red squares and its own linear trend line. - **Equations:** - The linear equation for **Material 1** is \( y = 1.5583x + 1.375 \) (Equation 2). This represents the deformation for Material 1 under applied force. - The linear equation for **Material 2** is \( y = 2.0583x + 0.2 \) (Equation 3), indicating the deformation for Material 2. **Analysis:** - The slope of the line indicates the spring constant for each material. - Material 2, with a slope of 2.0583, has a higher spring constant compared to Material 1, which has a slope of 1.5583. **Conclusion:** Material 2 exhibits a higher spring constant, indicating that it is stiffer compared to Material 1 under similar force conditions.
**Physics of Frictionless Waterslides: A Case Study**

**Scenario:**
Paul and Kathleen start from rest at the same time on frictionless waterslides with different shapes. The question is: Who makes it to the bottom first?

**Diagram Analysis:**

- **Setup:**
  - Two individuals, Paul and Kathleen, are on different waterslides.
  - Both slides are depicted as frictionless.
  - The slides are of different shapes, influencing the paths taken by Paul and Kathleen.

- **Energy Representation:**
  - Both individuals start with potential energy (PE) at the height \(h\).
  - As they slide down, potential energy is converted into kinetic energy (KE).
  - The energy transformations are represented by bars labeled "PE" and "KE" at various points along the slides.

- **Slide Paths:**
  - Paul's slide is relatively straight with a gentle curve.
  - Kathleen's slide has a steeper initial drop followed by a longer flat section.

- **Outcome Visualization:**
  - By the bottom of the slides, both individuals have converted their initial potential energy entirely into kinetic energy (depicted as "KE" at the base).

**Conclusion:**
The primary lesson from this scenario involves understanding energy conversion from potential to kinetic on frictionless surfaces and recognizing how slide shape impacts speed and time to reach the bottom. Both individuals will reach the bottom with the same speed due to energy conservation, but the shape of Kathleen’s slide might cause her to reach the bottom faster due to the initial steeper descent, highlighting principles of physics such as acceleration and motion.
Transcribed Image Text:**Physics of Frictionless Waterslides: A Case Study** **Scenario:** Paul and Kathleen start from rest at the same time on frictionless waterslides with different shapes. The question is: Who makes it to the bottom first? **Diagram Analysis:** - **Setup:** - Two individuals, Paul and Kathleen, are on different waterslides. - Both slides are depicted as frictionless. - The slides are of different shapes, influencing the paths taken by Paul and Kathleen. - **Energy Representation:** - Both individuals start with potential energy (PE) at the height \(h\). - As they slide down, potential energy is converted into kinetic energy (KE). - The energy transformations are represented by bars labeled "PE" and "KE" at various points along the slides. - **Slide Paths:** - Paul's slide is relatively straight with a gentle curve. - Kathleen's slide has a steeper initial drop followed by a longer flat section. - **Outcome Visualization:** - By the bottom of the slides, both individuals have converted their initial potential energy entirely into kinetic energy (depicted as "KE" at the base). **Conclusion:** The primary lesson from this scenario involves understanding energy conversion from potential to kinetic on frictionless surfaces and recognizing how slide shape impacts speed and time to reach the bottom. Both individuals will reach the bottom with the same speed due to energy conservation, but the shape of Kathleen’s slide might cause her to reach the bottom faster due to the initial steeper descent, highlighting principles of physics such as acceleration and motion.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
College Physics
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON