From the following data, use the conventional B/C ratio for a project that has a 20-year life to determine if it is economically justified. Use an interest rate of 8% per year. To the People Annual benefits $105,000 per year Annual disbenefits = $10,000 per year The B/C ratio is___. The project is______ To the Government First cost = $550,000 Annual cost = $29,000 per year Annual savings $30,000 per year

From the following data, use the conventional B/C ratio for a project that has a 20-year life to determine if it is economically justified. Use an interest rate of 8% per year. To the People Annual benefits $105,000 per year Annual disbenefits = $10,000 per year The B/C ratio is_. The project is____ To the Government First cost = $550,000 Annual cost = $29,000 per year Annual savings $30,000 per year

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Respond to the question with a concise and accurate answer, along with a clear explanation and step-by-step solution, or risk receiving a downvote. Assume a reservoir’s water supply of 25,000 acre-feet of water can be used for municipal (m) and/or agricultural (a) purposes. The total benefits for each use are described as: TBa = 1000Wa – 0.025Wa2 So, the Marginal Benefit for agriculture is: MBa = 1000 – 0.05 Wa TBm = 1500Wm – 0.1Wm2 So, the Marginal Benefit for municipal purposes is: MBm = 1500 – 0.2 Qm Where Wa is acre feet of water used in agriculture and Wm is acre feet of water used for municipal purposes b. Suppose an additional 1,000 acre feet of water could be had by constructing a new reservoir. What is the new efficient allocation of water for each category of use?
1)what is the best project based on simple payback 2) What is the best project based on discounted payback 3)What is beta B/C ratio 4) What is gammas B/C ratio
Typed and correct answer please. I will give votes.
The slope of TR and TC are each constant at 10 dollars and 5 dollars respectively and the total fixed cost is 1500 dollars, the breakeven is___________________? The market is [perfect or imperfect]?
Why CRS - Constant Returns on Scale would generate (1) No profit-maximizingproduction plan; the only nontrivial production plan involves zero profits. (2) Even when aprofit-maximizing plan exists, it is not unique?
All of the following would be considered in evaluating product or sales mix allocations, except a. deciding which product offers the lowest contribution margin per unit. b. deciding whether fixed costs would change as a result of the product sales mix. c. deciding upon any and all constraints associated with the product/sale mix. d. deciding which products will contribute the highest contribution margin per unit.
The small town of Happy Valley has seen a large influx of families with young children in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. These new families are considering pooling their resources to create a new public playground. There are three proposals for the playground: (1) Tier 1, a swing set; (2) Tier 2, a swing set plus a climber; and (3) Tier 3, a swing set and climber plus multiple slides. The total costs for building each version are listed below. Assume the playground would cost nothing to maintain. It turns out that the area where the playground will be located is on the border of Joyville, a neighboring town. Joyville has also seen a recent influx of families with young children, and there is no existing playground in Joyville. The table below shows the total benefits that would accrue to Happy Valley and Joyville families from the different tiers of the playground. Total Costs: Total Benefits: Happy Valley Families Joyville Families No playground $0 $0 $0 Tier 1 (swings) $5,000…
The National Environmental Protection Agency has established that 2.5% of the median household income is a reasonable amount to pay for safe drinking water. For a median household income of $45,000 per year, what would the health benefits have to be (in dollars per household per year) for the B/C ratio to be equal to 1.5?
The city of Oakmont is interested in developing some lake front property into a sports park (picnic facilities, boat docks, swimming area, etc.). A consultant has estimated that the city would need to invest $3 million in this project. In return, the developed property would return $500,000 per year to the city through increased tax revenues and recreational benefits to the public. What would the life of this project need to be in order to be cost-beneficial to the city? The interest rate on municipal bonds is 4% per year. E Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i= 4% per year. The life of the project needs to be at least years in order to be cost-beneficial to the city. (Round up to the nearest whole number.)
Not use Ai and chatgpt please.
Please no written by hand solutions Migrant workers and the VOSL Consider the following hypothetical scenario: A proposed publicly-funded mining project in northern Ontario is turned down by the provincial government on the basis of its having a benefit-cost ratio that is slightly less than one. The project would make significant accounting profits, but the work involved is extremely dangerous. When the risk of worker death is taken into account, and valued using Canada’s recommended value of a statistical life, the costs outweigh the benefits. The company that would have run the project makes the following objection: “We agree that, using the Canadian government’s recommended value of a statistical life to value expected worker deaths, the benefit cost ratio is less than one. This value was given as $6.5 million in 2009, which adjusted for Canadian CPI inflation is about $8.9 million in 2023. However, this project is only expected to employ Canadians in administrative positions. All…
Q7.2. From the following data, use the conventional B/C ratio for a project which has a 20-year life to determine if it is economically justified. Use an interest rate of 8% per year. Consequences To the People To the Government Annual benefits = $90,000 per year First cost = $750,000 !3! %3! Annual disbenefits $10,000 per year Annual cost = $50,000 per year %3D %3D Annual savings = $30,000 per year