**Instructions for Rate of Return (ROR) Analysis**For the five alternatives described in the table, determine which project(s) should be selected based on the Rate of Return (ROR) analysis method, considering a Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) of 15%.### 1. If they are independent: - Specify the projects that meet the criteria: - _______________ - _______________ ### 2. If they are mutually exclusive:Follow the steps below based on the comparison with MARR = 15%:#### Step 1:- Exclude alternatives __________ and __________ from the competition.#### Step 2:- ______________ (challenger) VS ______________ (defender) - Incremental Rate of Return ($\Delta i^*$) = __________ - Select: _______________#### Step 3:- ______________ (new challenger) VS ______________ (new defender) - Incremental Rate of Return ($\Delta i^*$) = __________### Table: Project Alternatives and Rate of Return| Alternative | Initial Investment, $ | Overall ROR vs DN, % | Incremental Rate of Return, % ||-------------|------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------|| A | -25,000 | 9.6 | — || B | -35,000 | 15.1 | 27.3, 9.4, 35.3, 25.0 || C | -40,000 | 13.4 | —, 0, 38.5, 24.4 || D | -60,000 | 25.4 | —, —, 46.5, 27.3 || E | -75,000 | 20.2 | —, —, —, 6.8 |**Graph/Diagram Explanation**:- The table is divided into columns for each alternative, detailing the initial investment required, the overall Rate of Return compared to the do-nothing (DN) scenario, and the incremental Rate of Return for comparisons between alternatives. **Decision-Making Process Using Incremental Rate of Return Analysis****Instructions:**For mutually exclusive alternatives, perform the following steps based on comparisons with a Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (MARR) of 15%.**Step 1:**- Exclude alternatives $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ and $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ from competition**Step 2:**- $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ (challenger) VS $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ (defender)- Calculate $ \Delta i^* = \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $- Select $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $**Step 3:**- $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ (new challenger) VS $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $ (new defender)- Calculate $ \Delta i^* = \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $- Select $ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ $**Data Table for Alternatives:**| Alternative | Initial Investment ($) | Overall ROR (%) ||-------------|------------------------|-----------------|| A | 25,000 | 9.6 || B | 35,000 | 15.1 || C | 40,000 | 13.4 || D | 60,000 | 25.4 || E | 75,000 | 20.2 |**Incremental Rate of Return Analysis:**| Incremental Rate of Return (%) | A | C | D | E ||--------------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|| A | \| | 27.3| 9.4 | 35.3| 25.0 || C | \| | 38.5| 24.4| || D | \| | | 46.5| 27.3|| E | \| | | | 6.8 |**Explanation:**The table compares different investment alternatives, their initial investments, and their overall rates of return (ROR). It also shows incremental rates of return as comparisons are made between different alternatives. This information assists in selecting the

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/32c07d3b-dfa3-4efa-b5c4-f1c6ebf7bd0b.jpg

For the five altematives described in the table on right.Note: the third column is ROR of each project (i"), while incremental ROR are Ai* values. At MARR of 15%, which project or projects should be selected, using ROR analysis method ? 1- if they are independents:

For the five altematives described in the table on right.Note: the third column is ROR of each project (i"), while incremental ROR are Ai* values. At MARR of 15%, which project or projects should be selected, using ROR analysis method ? 1- if they are independents:

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

We have the following K-T conditions: 1-10z + 3 – 6A 0 & x(10z+ 3 – 6) = 0 2-10x +1 – 31 0 & z(10x +1– 3) = 0 3-3 – 6x – 3z >0 & \>0 & \(3– 6x %D Which of the following best represents the problem associated with those K-T conditions? min(2.2) 10xz + 3x + z such that 3 6x + 3z Omin(r,2) 10æz + 3x + z such that 3 > 6x + 3z
The MARR is 15%. Three alternatives are available and the associated cash flow is as follow: Year First Cost A B C $1,700 $2,100 $3,750 Annual Benefit Useful Life 2 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 3 6 Answer the following in this format: 1.23 1. The payback period for Alternative A is 2. The payback period for Alternative B is 3. The payback period for Alternative C is Based on Payback period analysis, Alternative should be selected. (Enter only the letter)
!
Pls in details In the production of a certain product, two operation are available. One will produce 40 units of the finished product per P1,000.00 worth of raw materials and will cost P4.20 per unit of the finished product. The other process will produce 44 units of the finished product per P1,000.00 worth of raw materials and will cost P5.60 per unit of the finished product. What is the break-even point in unit value of the finished product below which the low efficiency process should be used and above which high efficiency should be used?
Please answer fast please arjent help please
4-10 Improvement and expansion of a production facility are being given economic consideration. At the present time (Alternative A), profits are running at $450,000 per year. Assume a washout in operating profit in cach of years one through 10 so they will remain constant at $450,000 per year. Two mutually exclusive alternatives for improve- ment and improvement combined with expansion are being consid- ered with projected costs and revenues as shown on the following time diagrams with all dollar values expressed in thousands of dollars. 450 450 450 A) ..... .... 0. 2 10 ... -800 700 700 700 B) 2 ... 10 850 -900 C) -1,300 1,050 1,050 1 ..... 10 1) For a minimum rate of return of 15% determine whether the present project "A," improvement project "B," or improvement plus expansion project "C" is economically best using ROR, NPV, and PVR. 2) Then increase the minimum ROR to 25% from 15% over the entire 10-year evaluation life and re-evaluate the alternatives using both ROR and NPV…
4.3. Use ERR analysis to determine which alternative would be the best economical choice. Verify your decision with NPC analysis. Assume the MARR equals 10%. Alternative A: -500 -25 -25 -25 -25 L = 100 Alternative B: 1 3 -300 -50 -50 -50 -50 L= 25 Alternative C: 2 3 -250 -75 -60 -45 -30 L= 10 Alternative D: 2 450 -35 -35 -35 -35 L= 100
answer asap with diagrams
Two mutually exculsive alternative are being considered for the environmental protection equipment at a petroleum refinary. one of these alternatives must be selected. The estimated cash flow for each alternatives are as follows. Use MARR of 10% Note: Do not round in between solutions and round up to 2 decimal places for final asnwer. A. Which alternative is preferred, based on the repeatability assumptions? Use AW method.
Most likely estimates for a project are as follows. Choose the correct choice below. MARR Useful life Initial investment Receipts-Expenses (R-E) Determine whether the statement "This project (based upon the most likely estimates) is profitable." is true or false Click the icon to view the relationship between the PW and the percent change in parameter Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 15% per year. O False O True 15% per year 6 years $6,500 $1,800/year am
Which of the following interpretations would be best for the scenario analysis results shown below? Worst- case PW (18%) -$650,000 IRR 2.10% Most- likely case Best-case $58,000 $2,660,000 33% 14.60% a. Since the most-likely case has a PW <0, the project should be abandoned immediately b. Since the worst-case has a negative present worth, this project must be rejected. c. Since the average of the three cases is a positive present worth, the project is acceptable. d. Because only one of the scenarios shows the project as profitable, the project should be considered very risky, and, if accepted, should be subject to greater scrutiny in its planning and forecasting.
The table below summarizes the comparison between four mutually exclusive alternatives using the IRR method. The MARR is 10%. Which alternative should be the base aftemative in the first step of the incremental analysis? Alternative Initial Cost Annual Income IRR P $110,000 $21.500 14.5% Q $130,000 $31,200 20.2% OA Atemative R because it has the lowest initial cost OB. Alternative 5 because it has the largest initial cost OC. Allamative Q because it has the highest IRR D. Alemative P because it has the lowest IRR R $95,000 $20,000 16.5% $ $354,000 $74,000 16.3%