For LSD, how would you report your results? A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (107.15) was significantly lower than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (112.40) and older subjects (109.08). A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (109.08) and older subjects (107.15) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for middle-ag subjects (112.40). O A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (107.15) and middle-age subjects (108.40) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40). O A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects 108.40) and middle-age subjects (109.08) were not different, but both were significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (107.15). O A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (109.08) was significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (108.40) but significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40).

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
For LSD, how would you report your results?
A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (107.15) was significantly
lower than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (112.40) and older subjects (109.08).
A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (109.08) and older
subjects (107.15) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for middle-age
subjects (112.40).
A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (107.15) and middle-age
subjects (108.40) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older
subjects (112.40).
A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects 108.40) and middle-age
subjects (109.08) were not different, but both were significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for older
subjects (107.15).
O A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (109.08) was significantly
higher than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (108.40) but significantly lower than the mean FIQ
score for older subjects (112.40).
Transcribed Image Text:For LSD, how would you report your results? A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (107.15) was significantly lower than the mean FIQ scores for middle-age subjects (112.40) and older subjects (109.08). A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (109.08) and older subjects (107.15) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (112.40). A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects (107.15) and middle-age subjects (108.40) were not different, but both were significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40). A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ scores for younger subjects 108.40) and middle-age subjects (109.08) were not different, but both were significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (107.15). O A LSD post hoc test (p < .05) revealed that the mean FIQ score for younger subjects (109.08) was significantly higher than the mean FIQ score for middle-age subjects (108.40) but significantly lower than the mean FIQ score for older subjects (112.40).
Oneway
Descriptives
WAIS-R full scale IQ
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Post Hoc Tests
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Minimum
Maximum
5-25 Years
185
107.15
11.946
.878
105.41
108.88
77
146
26-59 Years
Multiple Comparisons
380
108.40
12.840
.659
107.11
109.70
73
150
60-92 Years
185
112.40
12.052
.886
110.65
114.15
81
143
Dependent Variable: WAIS-R full scale IQ
Total
750
109.08
12.572
459
108.18
109.98
73
150
LSD
Mean
Difference (I-
J)
95% Confidence Interval
ANOVA
(1) Subjects age in years
(J) Subjects age in years
Std. Error
Sig.
Lower Bound Upper Bound
WAIS-R full scale IQ
Sum of
5-25 Years
26-59 Years
-1.257
1.115
.260
-3.44
.93
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
60-92 Years
-5.254
1.293
<.001
-7.79
-2.72
Between Groups
2905.502
2
1452.751
9.398
<.001
26-59 Years
5-25 Years
1.257
1.115
.260
-.93
3.44
Within Groups
115472.857
747
154.582
60-92 Years
-3.997"
1.115
<.001
-6.19
-1.81
Total
118378.359
749
60-92 Years
5-25 Years
5.254
1.293
<.001
2.72
7.79
ANOVA Effect Sizes
26-59 Years
3.997
1.115
<,001
1.81
6.19
Point
95% Confidence Interval
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Estimate
Lower
Upper
WAIS-R full scale IQ Eta-squared
.025
.006
.049
Epsilon-squared
.022
.004
.046
Omega-squared Fixed-
.022
.004
.046
effect
Omega-squared
.011
.002
.024
Random-effect
a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.
Transcribed Image Text:Oneway Descriptives WAIS-R full scale IQ 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Post Hoc Tests Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum 5-25 Years 185 107.15 11.946 .878 105.41 108.88 77 146 26-59 Years Multiple Comparisons 380 108.40 12.840 .659 107.11 109.70 73 150 60-92 Years 185 112.40 12.052 .886 110.65 114.15 81 143 Dependent Variable: WAIS-R full scale IQ Total 750 109.08 12.572 459 108.18 109.98 73 150 LSD Mean Difference (I- J) 95% Confidence Interval ANOVA (1) Subjects age in years (J) Subjects age in years Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound WAIS-R full scale IQ Sum of 5-25 Years 26-59 Years -1.257 1.115 .260 -3.44 .93 Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 60-92 Years -5.254 1.293 <.001 -7.79 -2.72 Between Groups 2905.502 2 1452.751 9.398 <.001 26-59 Years 5-25 Years 1.257 1.115 .260 -.93 3.44 Within Groups 115472.857 747 154.582 60-92 Years -3.997" 1.115 <.001 -6.19 -1.81 Total 118378.359 749 60-92 Years 5-25 Years 5.254 1.293 <.001 2.72 7.79 ANOVA Effect Sizes 26-59 Years 3.997 1.115 <,001 1.81 6.19 Point 95% Confidence Interval *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Estimate Lower Upper WAIS-R full scale IQ Eta-squared .025 .006 .049 Epsilon-squared .022 .004 .046 Omega-squared Fixed- .022 .004 .046 effect Omega-squared .011 .002 .024 Random-effect a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman