For Loyalists taking refuge in British-held cities at the end of the war, the prospect of leaving the United States as refugees in other corners of the British empire was A B с D irrational, given the conciliatory policies of most states in the U.S. toward former Loyalists. reassuring, given the long history of well- managed evacuations in the British empire. profitable, given their ability to transfer all of their wealth with them. logical, given the financial and physical perils that they likely faced in the U.S.

icon
Related questions
Question
For Loyalists taking refuge in British-held cities at the end of
the war, the prospect of leaving the United States as
refugees in other corners of the British empire was
A
B
C
D
irrational, given the conciliatory policies of most
states in the U.S. toward former Loyalists.
reassuring, given the long history of well-
managed evacuations in the British empire.
profitable, given their ability to transfer all of their
wealth with them.
logical, given the financial and physical perils that
they likely faced in the U.S.
Transcribed Image Text:For Loyalists taking refuge in British-held cities at the end of the war, the prospect of leaving the United States as refugees in other corners of the British empire was A B C D irrational, given the conciliatory policies of most states in the U.S. toward former Loyalists. reassuring, given the long history of well- managed evacuations in the British empire. profitable, given their ability to transfer all of their wealth with them. logical, given the financial and physical perils that they likely faced in the U.S.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer