Answered: For an operator to represent a… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

For an operator to represent a physically observable property, it must be Hermitian, but need not be linear.
True
False

Expert Solution

Step 1

Given that- For an operator to represent a physically observable property,it must be hermitian,But need not be linear.

We have to tell that Is this statement true or false?

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Under what conditions will a linear operator L̑ on a function space be Hermitian?
The Hamiltonian matrix has been constructed using an orthonormal basis. (1 1 0V (1 0 1) A = (2 1 0 )+(0 2 2 \2 1 4 where H = Hº + V and cis a constant. 1 2 0/ b) Use time-independent perturbation theory to determine the eigenvalues with corrections up to second order.
Show that the operator H = -1/2(d^2/dx^2) is hermitian, assuming that it operates on a Hilbert space of L^2 functions whose functions and derivatives vanish at x = −∞ and x = +∞
In the operator eigenvalue equation, Af(x) =a f(x), which of the following statements is not true? the effect of the operator, A, on f(x) is to increase its magnitude by a factor of a Omultiples of f(x) would be eigenfunctions of the operator, A Of(x) is an eigenfunction of the operator, A the number, a, must be equal to 0 or 1 OOO O