Foos (1997) determined a first-order rate constant for the removal of Fe2+ from a stream (Case Study 2–1). Discharge from a point source adds Fe2+ to a river. Using the rate constant determined by Foos (1997) and a stream velocity of 0.5 m s–1, calculate the transport distance required to achieve a 90% reduction in the amount of Fe2+ in solution. To do this problem you will first need to find

Chemistry
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter1: Chemical Foundations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...
icon
Related questions
Question

33. Foos (1997) determined a first-order rate constant for the removal of Fe2+ from a stream (Case Study 2–1). Discharge from a point source adds Fe2+ to a river. Using the rate constant determined by Foos (1997) and a stream velocity of 0.5 m s–1, calculate the transport distance required to achieve a 90% reduction in the amount of Fe2+ in solution. To do this problem you will first need to find the amount of time required to reduce the iron concentration by 90%.

 

CASE STUDY 2–1
indicating that these species behaved conservatively; i.e., they
were not reacting with their surroundings. However, the model
did not accurately predict the concentrations of HCO, , SO;-,
Fe3+, Mn²+, and Si. The model underestimated the concentra-
tion of HCO,, indicating that this species was being added to
the system, and overestimated the concentrations of the other
four species, indicating that they were being removed from the
system. Sampling along the length of the discharge stream
showed a downstream increase in HCO, and a downstream de-
crease in the other four species. There was an excellent correla-
tion between Fe²+ concentration and distance.
Geochemical Modeling of Coal Mine Drainage,
Summit County, Ohio
A serious problem associated with coal mining is the generation
of acid mine drainage (AMD). During mining, sulfur-bearing
minerals, such as pyrite (FeS2), are exposed to oxygen and
water, leading to a series of oxidation and hydrolysis reactions
that produce sulfuric acid. The resulting waters are strongly
acidic (pH of 2 or less is possible) and have high concentrations
of SO, Fe²+, Al³+, and Mn²*. Such waters are toxic to
aquatic life and vegetation.
Foos (1997) investigated the downstream changes in the
chemistry of coal mine drainage at Silver Creek Metropark,
Summit County, Ohio. The first step was to construct a simple
mixing model in which AMD and water discharged from Silver
Creek lake were the end members. This model successfully pre-
dicted the concentrations of Cl¯, PO-, Ca²+, Mg²+ and Na*,
Saturation indices (SI) were calculated, using the water-
chemistry program WATEQ4F, for solid phases that could play
a role in controlling the concentrations of these species. The re-
sults are tabulated here. SI = log(IAP/K»p) and the equilibrium
constants were calculated for a temperature of 11.5°C, the tem-
perature of the AMD discharge.
Phase
Formula
SI
Phase
Formula
SI
Fe,O3
FEOOH
Hematite
14.93
Quartz
Chalcedony
SiO2 (aq)
Aragonite
SiO2
SiO2
SiO2
CACO3
CACO3
CaMg(CO3)2
0.53
Goethite
6.96
0.06
Ferrihydrite
Pyrolusite
Manganite
Rhodochrosite
Fe(OH)3
1.07
-0.83
-14.27
-2.09
MnO2
MNOOH
-6.44
Calcite
-1.94
MNCO3
-1.17
Dolomite
-4.61
The water was supersaturated with respect to all of the iron-
containing phases, and further investigation revealed that about
80% of the iron was removed as ferrihydrite. Thus, precipita-
tion of iron-containing phases was the cause of the decrease in
Fe2+ in the downstream direction. The water was undersatu-
ganic carbon where the stream flowed from an area of mowed
lawn into a wooded area of dense vegetation.
The author of the study was able to calculate a rate constant
for the removal of Fe²* assuming a steady-state model. The
model is a first-order rate equation that can be written as follows:
rated with respect to all Mn-bearing phases, and it was con-
cluded that Mn²+ was being removed by adsorption onto the
dC
- kC = 0
dx
surface of the iron hydroxides. The water was slightly oversat-
urated with respect to the Si-containing phases, so it is possible
that precipitation of these phases was causing the downstream
decrease in Si. The waters are undersaturated in terms of the
where V is the velocity of the stream, C is the concentration, and
x is the distance. Solving this equation for k gives a rate constant
of 2.9 × 10¬4 s-.
carbonate-containing phases, and it was concluded that the
downstream increase in HCO, was due to the addition of or-
Source: Foos (1997).
Transcribed Image Text:CASE STUDY 2–1 indicating that these species behaved conservatively; i.e., they were not reacting with their surroundings. However, the model did not accurately predict the concentrations of HCO, , SO;-, Fe3+, Mn²+, and Si. The model underestimated the concentra- tion of HCO,, indicating that this species was being added to the system, and overestimated the concentrations of the other four species, indicating that they were being removed from the system. Sampling along the length of the discharge stream showed a downstream increase in HCO, and a downstream de- crease in the other four species. There was an excellent correla- tion between Fe²+ concentration and distance. Geochemical Modeling of Coal Mine Drainage, Summit County, Ohio A serious problem associated with coal mining is the generation of acid mine drainage (AMD). During mining, sulfur-bearing minerals, such as pyrite (FeS2), are exposed to oxygen and water, leading to a series of oxidation and hydrolysis reactions that produce sulfuric acid. The resulting waters are strongly acidic (pH of 2 or less is possible) and have high concentrations of SO, Fe²+, Al³+, and Mn²*. Such waters are toxic to aquatic life and vegetation. Foos (1997) investigated the downstream changes in the chemistry of coal mine drainage at Silver Creek Metropark, Summit County, Ohio. The first step was to construct a simple mixing model in which AMD and water discharged from Silver Creek lake were the end members. This model successfully pre- dicted the concentrations of Cl¯, PO-, Ca²+, Mg²+ and Na*, Saturation indices (SI) were calculated, using the water- chemistry program WATEQ4F, for solid phases that could play a role in controlling the concentrations of these species. The re- sults are tabulated here. SI = log(IAP/K»p) and the equilibrium constants were calculated for a temperature of 11.5°C, the tem- perature of the AMD discharge. Phase Formula SI Phase Formula SI Fe,O3 FEOOH Hematite 14.93 Quartz Chalcedony SiO2 (aq) Aragonite SiO2 SiO2 SiO2 CACO3 CACO3 CaMg(CO3)2 0.53 Goethite 6.96 0.06 Ferrihydrite Pyrolusite Manganite Rhodochrosite Fe(OH)3 1.07 -0.83 -14.27 -2.09 MnO2 MNOOH -6.44 Calcite -1.94 MNCO3 -1.17 Dolomite -4.61 The water was supersaturated with respect to all of the iron- containing phases, and further investigation revealed that about 80% of the iron was removed as ferrihydrite. Thus, precipita- tion of iron-containing phases was the cause of the decrease in Fe2+ in the downstream direction. The water was undersatu- ganic carbon where the stream flowed from an area of mowed lawn into a wooded area of dense vegetation. The author of the study was able to calculate a rate constant for the removal of Fe²* assuming a steady-state model. The model is a first-order rate equation that can be written as follows: rated with respect to all Mn-bearing phases, and it was con- cluded that Mn²+ was being removed by adsorption onto the dC - kC = 0 dx surface of the iron hydroxides. The water was slightly oversat- urated with respect to the Si-containing phases, so it is possible that precipitation of these phases was causing the downstream decrease in Si. The waters are undersaturated in terms of the where V is the velocity of the stream, C is the concentration, and x is the distance. Solving this equation for k gives a rate constant of 2.9 × 10¬4 s-. carbonate-containing phases, and it was concluded that the downstream increase in HCO, was due to the addition of or- Source: Foos (1997).
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 8 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Photochemistry
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9780078021558
Author:
Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079373
Author:
William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY