Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.4 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. 7.4 139 Overhead Width (cm) 8.2 203 9.9 269 8.5 184 8.6 8.4 Weight (kg) 210 207 9 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r The regression equation is y =-220.7+ (49.7x (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.4 cm is - 101.4 kg. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O B. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. OC. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.4 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use
a significance level of 0.05.
Overhead Width (cm)
7.4
8.2
9.9
8.5
8.6
8.4
Weight (kg)
139
203
269
184
210
207
A Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r.
The regression equation is y =-220.7 + 49.7 x.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.4 cm is - 101.4 kg.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case?
O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.
O B. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.
OC. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation.
O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.
Transcribed Image Text:Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.4 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) 7.4 8.2 9.9 8.5 8.6 8.4 Weight (kg) 139 203 269 184 210 207 A Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The regression equation is y =-220.7 + 49.7 x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.4 cm is - 101.4 kg. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O B. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. OC. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman