Fill out the table for executing the polynomial-time dynamic programming algo- rithm for deciding whether the string 1001 is in the context-free language generated by the | following CFG. Fill the table completely do not stop the algorithm early. (Note: This CFG is not quite in Chomsky Normal Form since A appears on the right-hand side of a rule, but the same algorithm still works.) A + BC | CC B → BA| 0 С + АВ | BB | 1

Fill out the table for executing the polynomial-time dynamic programming algo- rithm for deciding whether the string 1001 is in the context-free language generated by the | following CFG. Fill the table completely do not stop the algorithm early. (Note: This CFG is not quite in Chomsky Normal Form since A appears on the right-hand side of a rule, but the same algorithm still works.) A + BC | CC B → BA| 0 С + АВ | BB | 1

C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program Design

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337102087

Author:D. S. Malik

Publisher:D. S. Malik

Chapter15: Recursion

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Write the simplest C++ program that will demonstrate iteration vs recursion using the following guidelines - Please include pre/post and pseudocode for the 3 functions which are not 'main' in the solution. Write two primary helper functions - one iterative (IsArrayPrimeIter) and one recursive (IsArrayPrimeRecur) - each of which Take an array and its size as input params and return a bool such that 'true' ==> array and all elements are prime, 'false' ==> at least one element in array is not prime, so array is not prime. Print out a message "Entering <function_name>" as the first statement of each function. Perform the code to test whether every element of the array is a Prime number. Print out a message "Leaving <function_name>" as the last statement before returning from the function. Remember - there will be nested loops for the iterative function and there can be no loops at all in the recursive function. For the recursive function - define one other helper…
Recursive Palindrome! Recall that a palindrome is a string that reads the same forward and backward. Write a recursive function is_palindrome (s:str) -> bool to check whether a string s is a palindrome. Here's a hint: think about how you can use is_palindrome(t), where t is a substring of s, to help you decide whether s is a palindrome. Your Answer: 1 # Put your answer here 2 Submit
DO NOT COPY ANSWER FROM ANOTHER QUESTION LEAVE IF you cannot do it perfectly. Otherwise, I will not only DOWN the vote but also REPORT you to the official Chegg team.I won't stop calling Chegg until they really pay attention to this trash behavior. Write a structurally recursive function (prefix->postfix exp) that takes as input an expression in the same little language as Problem 4. prefix->postfix returns an expression of the same form as its input, except that all function applications have been reversed. Finish this Racket code below to answer the question above.(define prefix->postfix(lambda (exp)))
e. Problem 5. Devise a function that receives a string and computes how many asterisks are in the string with a recursive method. For instance, if the input is "Able was I ere ***Elba", the function should output 3. If the input is "Peanuts", the function should return 0. Approach: Let's assume the signature of our function is countAsterisks(s) where s is the input string. In the body of your function, check if s[0] is equal to an asterisk. If the string contains only a single character and it is an asterisk, return 1. If the string contains only a single character and it is not an asterisk, return 0. If the string is longer than one character, determine if the first character is an asterisk and count it if this is the case. Then, create a new string s1 that is the same as the input string s but without the first character. Recursively call countAsterisks (s1) and return the value returned from this recursive call, plus one (if there is an asterisk in s[0]). Also, writing any explicit…
(IV) Give regular expressions for the following: L = {anbm | n ≥2, m <4} (i) Give two strings that are in the language. (ii) Give the regular expression for the complement of the above language.
Must be new solution and run on GNU Common Lisp! Using Lisp, write a program that solves the Missionaries and Cannibals problem that uses a DFS( depth first search). It should use (mac start end). Start is the current state (which can be (3 3 l) and End is the goal state (which can be (0 0 r). This should output the sequences of moves needed to reach the end state from the start state. This should print nil if there is no solution. For example, the call should be something like this! Call: (mac '(3 3 l) '(0 0 r)) Output: ((3 3 l) (2 2 r) (3 2 l) (3 0 r) (3 1 l) (1 1 r) (2 2 l) (0 2 r) (0 3 l) (0 1 r) (1 1 l) (0 0 r))
Design DFA {w ∈ Σ ∗ | |w| ≥ 3 and the second symbol from the left end of w is different from the last symbol of w}. For example, 010100 is in the language, but 0001100 is not in the language.
The compiler scans the expression either from left to right or from right to left.Consider the expression: a + b * c + dThe compiler first scans the expression to evaluate the expression “b * c”, then again scan the expression to add “a” to it. The result is then added to “d” after another scan. The repeated scanning makes it very in-efficient. It is better to convert the expression to postfix (or prefix) form before evaluation. The corresponding expression in postfix form is: “a b c*+d+”. The postfix expressions can be evaluated easily using a stack.ImplementationYou have to implement the following functionality using stack which takes input of fully parenthesized infix expressions and convert it to postfix form.Sample Input:(((12+13)*(20-30))/(811+99))Sample Output: (there is a single space in between each operator and operand)12 13+20 30-*811 99+/Hint:Take input in an array of character arrays, where each index of the array is itself a character array. Each index stores either…
In kotlin, Write a recursive linear search function that takes a String and a Char and returns true if the String contains the Char. The base cases are that a) the length of the String is 0 or b) the first character in the String is the character we are searching for. then Modify the linear search function so that both the String and the Char are nullable. If either is null, return false.
-> + -> -> If we were to naively translate the productions above into a function in a recursive descent parser we'd get something like the following (consider that expect consumes the token that matches the given lexeme): def exp(): if exp(): if expect ('+') or expect('-'): if term(): return True else: if term(): return True return false What is the problem (if any) with this naive implementation and what would you do to circumvent the problem?
in kotlin, Write two versions of the recursive summation function (that is, take an int parameter n and calculate the sum of all integers from 1 to n). One version should use a block body, and the other should use an expression body. Test the functions using a main()
Remove the left recursion from the productions: E →E+T|E-T|T T→T* FT/F | F Applying the transformation yields: