Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those Deated with magnets Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? sample mean Since the for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. -934-₂.994
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those Deated with magnets Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? sample mean Since the for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. -934-₂.994
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Solve for B ..if you could show how to put it in a ti84 plus calculator that would be great to
![Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The
results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard
deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below.
a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
A. Ho: H₁ H2
Ha My H2
OC. Ho: H₁ H₂
H₁: H₁ <H₂
The test statistic, t, is .09. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
The P-value is 466. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
State the conclusion for the test.
www
Since the
B. Ho: H1 <H₂
H₁ H₁ H2
D. Ho: ₁ = 2
H₁: H₁ H₂
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?
sample mean
for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it
is
b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
-.934 <H1-H₂.994
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Treatment
H₁
17
X 0.48
S 0.86
H
n
valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger.
Sham
H2
17
0.45
1.16](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fe8cfba0d-157f-44dd-a2a6-39d699d660af%2F426ebefb-7a5d-436e-b5e4-d48e301ed8c4%2Fzxkepzi_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The
results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard
deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below.
a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
A. Ho: H₁ H2
Ha My H2
OC. Ho: H₁ H₂
H₁: H₁ <H₂
The test statistic, t, is .09. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
The P-value is 466. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
State the conclusion for the test.
www
Since the
B. Ho: H1 <H₂
H₁ H₁ H2
D. Ho: ₁ = 2
H₁: H₁ H₂
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?
sample mean
for those treated with magnets is greater than the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it
is
b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
-.934 <H1-H₂.994
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Treatment
H₁
17
X 0.48
S 0.86
H
n
valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger.
Sham
H2
17
0.45
1.16
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134683416/9780134683416_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
![The Basic Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319042578/9781319042578_smallCoverImage.gif)
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
![Introduction to the Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319013387/9781319013387_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman