Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Psychology
explain mental frames, according to the photo below or express the main points

explain mental frames, according to the photo below or express the main points

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
explain mental frames, according to the photo below or express the main points
7 LESSON 3 Mental Frames Introduction To put theories or mental models to work, we use an approach referred to as systems thinking. While strategic thinking involves consideration of the big picture, systems thinking begins when we consider a real-world phenomenon and seek to understand the cause and effect relationships characteristic of a "system." A systems thinker wonders how an organization works, looking at the parts as dynamic aspects of the whole. It is the interrelationships of the elements of an organization that interests the systems thinker. The Mental Frames Organization leaders use mental frames to simplify the world they are observing and to make the decision-making process more efficient. Under normal conditions, mental frames are generally very useful. Mental framing is a selective, reductive excessively narrow way by which a question or information used to take a decision is expressed, presented, worded, formulated, categorized, and pictured. A framing is done by the agent itself who designates his selective perceptions and representations of realities and issues and by the advisors or third parties who feed the agent with a selective formulation that disseminates their own picture of things. Example, 50 pesos a day seems less costly than 18000 pesos a month; Saying "there is 50% chance of success" instead of "50% chances to fail" could change a decision (the famous half-full or half-empty glass is a common be a cause for optimism (half full) or pessimism (half empty), or as a general litmus expression, generally used rhetorically to indicate that a particular situation could test to simply mine an individual's worldview). Some framing is due to pure reasoning errors, logical fallacies, confusions, and bogus information or knowledge that sneakily infiltrated the memory at one time or another. Then, the decisions use mixed up or misunderstood notions or facts. Framing is the process of understanding and interpreting a particular event. Goffman (1974) defines frames as "principles of organization which govern events at least social ones and our subjective involvement in them". Frames are the "schemata of interpretation" that allow individuals "to locate, perceive, identify, 133
Transcribed Image Text:7 LESSON 3 Mental Frames Introduction To put theories or mental models to work, we use an approach referred to as systems thinking. While strategic thinking involves consideration of the big picture, systems thinking begins when we consider a real-world phenomenon and seek to understand the cause and effect relationships characteristic of a "system." A systems thinker wonders how an organization works, looking at the parts as dynamic aspects of the whole. It is the interrelationships of the elements of an organization that interests the systems thinker. The Mental Frames Organization leaders use mental frames to simplify the world they are observing and to make the decision-making process more efficient. Under normal conditions, mental frames are generally very useful. Mental framing is a selective, reductive excessively narrow way by which a question or information used to take a decision is expressed, presented, worded, formulated, categorized, and pictured. A framing is done by the agent itself who designates his selective perceptions and representations of realities and issues and by the advisors or third parties who feed the agent with a selective formulation that disseminates their own picture of things. Example, 50 pesos a day seems less costly than 18000 pesos a month; Saying "there is 50% chance of success" instead of "50% chances to fail" could change a decision (the famous half-full or half-empty glass is a common be a cause for optimism (half full) or pessimism (half empty), or as a general litmus expression, generally used rhetorically to indicate that a particular situation could test to simply mine an individual's worldview). Some framing is due to pure reasoning errors, logical fallacies, confusions, and bogus information or knowledge that sneakily infiltrated the memory at one time or another. Then, the decisions use mixed up or misunderstood notions or facts. Framing is the process of understanding and interpreting a particular event. Goffman (1974) defines frames as "principles of organization which govern events at least social ones and our subjective involvement in them". Frames are the "schemata of interpretation" that allow individuals "to locate, perceive, identify, 133
and label a seemingly infinite number of concrete occurrences... rendering what would otherwise be a meaningless aspect of the scene into something that is meaningful". Gitlin (1980) suggests that "Frames are principles of selection, emphasis, and presentation composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what matters." Shön (1983) describes framing as a mental device that sets the boundaries of our attention, while Ahn and Ergin (2006) model frames in terms of different levels of awareness. Mental frames are important in decision making not only by simplifying the chaotic situation that the agent faces, but also by defining the problem itself Brubaker, Loveman, and Stamatov (2004) suggest that "cognitive perspectives are not things in the world but ways of seeing the world". Kahneman and Tversky (1979) incorporate framing as an essential part of their prospect theory, where they distinguish two discrete phases in a decision-making process: a phase of framing, editing and analysis, followed by a phase of evaluation of the various prospects. Later studies (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981; 1986) have documented large and systematic changes in an individual's preference caused by variations in the framing of the available options in terms of gains and losses. Individuals use frames to simplify the interconnections in their environment. In that sense, framing acts similar to a model is an attempt to simplify complex issues. Consequently, a mental frame carries along the shortcomings of theoretical models - its deduction results in high efficiency in decision making since the agent uses mental shortcuts and rules of thumb instead of considering all possible relations; however, it also results in a major drawback since anything what is left out of the frame is ignored. A basic notion underlying much of the literature on heuristics is that these mental shortcuts are many times systematically biased (Kahneman, et. al, 2000). Vab Mental frame is a frame through which we view the world. We attend to what is inside our frame, oblivious sometimes to what occurs outside our frames, which can lead to dangerous blind spots. Frames can be useful insofar as they direct our attention toward the information we seek. But they can also constrict our peripheral vision, keeping us from noticing important information and, perhaps, opportunities. Once liberating, mental models can become shackles. 134 The Fram Blank easily a da issue and (framed) a unwanted 1. Repre mode 2. Avail the m irrele Biase mental se manipula The cons Του about eith 1. Thw exam or ne 2. Thos prac
Transcribed Image Text:and label a seemingly infinite number of concrete occurrences... rendering what would otherwise be a meaningless aspect of the scene into something that is meaningful". Gitlin (1980) suggests that "Frames are principles of selection, emphasis, and presentation composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what matters." Shön (1983) describes framing as a mental device that sets the boundaries of our attention, while Ahn and Ergin (2006) model frames in terms of different levels of awareness. Mental frames are important in decision making not only by simplifying the chaotic situation that the agent faces, but also by defining the problem itself Brubaker, Loveman, and Stamatov (2004) suggest that "cognitive perspectives are not things in the world but ways of seeing the world". Kahneman and Tversky (1979) incorporate framing as an essential part of their prospect theory, where they distinguish two discrete phases in a decision-making process: a phase of framing, editing and analysis, followed by a phase of evaluation of the various prospects. Later studies (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981; 1986) have documented large and systematic changes in an individual's preference caused by variations in the framing of the available options in terms of gains and losses. Individuals use frames to simplify the interconnections in their environment. In that sense, framing acts similar to a model is an attempt to simplify complex issues. Consequently, a mental frame carries along the shortcomings of theoretical models - its deduction results in high efficiency in decision making since the agent uses mental shortcuts and rules of thumb instead of considering all possible relations; however, it also results in a major drawback since anything what is left out of the frame is ignored. A basic notion underlying much of the literature on heuristics is that these mental shortcuts are many times systematically biased (Kahneman, et. al, 2000). Vab Mental frame is a frame through which we view the world. We attend to what is inside our frame, oblivious sometimes to what occurs outside our frames, which can lead to dangerous blind spots. Frames can be useful insofar as they direct our attention toward the information we seek. But they can also constrict our peripheral vision, keeping us from noticing important information and, perhaps, opportunities. Once liberating, mental models can become shackles. 134 The Fram Blank easily a da issue and (framed) a unwanted 1. Repre mode 2. Avail the m irrele Biase mental se manipula The cons Του about eith 1. Thw exam or ne 2. Thos prac
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS