1. 6. Consider an individual who initially works T-L. hours per week, where (T-L.)>0. They earn an hourly wage (W) and no non-labour income. a) Draw a graph that reflects this individual's income-leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (U.) and choice of leisure hours (L). b) The government then implements a wage subsidy program in which worker wages are increased by 10%. This wage subsidy program has no limits, so there is no phase-in/out. This wage subsidy produces both an income effect and a substitution effect on the worker's choice of leisure hours. Assume that the substitution effect is stronger than the income effect. On the same graph as parta, draw this individual's new income-leisure constraint, utility- maximizing indifference curve (U.) and choice of leisure hours (Ls). [Note: When incorporating the 10% wage subsidy into the graph in part b, I am not expecting perfect precision. Just try your best to draw the new income-leisure constraint as though a 10% wage subsidy has been added.] (Ctrl) -

1. 6. Consider an individual who initially works T-L. hours per week, where (T-L.)>0. They earn an hourly wage (W) and no non-labour income. a) Draw a graph that reflects this individual's income-leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (U.) and choice of leisure hours (L). b) The government then implements a wage subsidy program in which worker wages are increased by 10%. This wage subsidy program has no limits, so there is no phase-in/out. This wage subsidy produces both an income effect and a substitution effect on the worker's choice of leisure hours. Assume that the substitution effect is stronger than the income effect. On the same graph as parta, draw this individual's new income-leisure constraint, utility- maximizing indifference curve (U.) and choice of leisure hours (Ls). [Note: When incorporating the 10% wage subsidy into the graph in part b, I am not expecting perfect precision. Just try your best to draw the new income-leisure constraint as though a 10% wage subsidy has been added.] (Ctrl) -

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a parent, with $200 in nonlabor income per week, who can earn $10per hour working between 0 and 60 hours per week. If this parent decides to work at allthen high-quality day care will cost a fixed $100 per week. a) Draw the budget line for this parent.
(a) Carlos has 168 hours per week to divide between labour and leisure. For his job, Carlos is allowed to work up to 60 hours a week earning a wage of $25, but faces a payroll tax of 20%. Given these constraints, Carlos chooses to work 40 hours per week. Graph the budget constraint and indicate the optimal choice, make sure to label all important points. (b) The government proposes a universal basic income whereby everyone is given $200 a week, which is financed by increasing the payroll tax to 40%. Add this new budget constraint to your diagram from (a). Be sure to show all your work/calculations, and label all important points. Is this likely to increase or decrease labour supply for Carlos? Carefully explain. (It is important that you carefully draw your diagram for this question, and compare it to the one in (a)).
23. A worker has utility over consumption c and leisure I given by U(c,1) = a 6-6 + 18 where 0 << 1 She has T hours to allocate between leisure and work. For each hour she works, she earns a wage of w to spend on consumption c. The price of c is 1. She also receives an additional 'non-labor income' m regardless of how much she works. She maximizes utility subject to the following constraints: contact@cloure.m Assume interior solution, then cw(T-1) +m C≥O 0≤1≤T A. c is normal and I is inferior good. B. c is inferior and I is inferior good. C. c is inferior and I is normal good. D. c is normal and I is normal good. Page 8
P2
The equilibrium wage rate in an industry is determined by a) whether workers or management are better at negotiating. b) finding where the market supply curve indicates that the substitution effect and income effect of a wage increase are offsetting. c) the strength of the substitution effect relative to the elasticity of demand for labor. d) the intersection of the market demand curve for labor and the market supply curve for labor.
21. Let U=x 2 +y 2 is the utility function of a worker who has 10 hours that to be allocatedbetween labour supply (L) and leisure (x). Let y is a consumption good whose price is 1.Wage rate (w) is Rs 1 and non-wage income is 20. Find out L.a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none 22. On the basis of the above question, hen w=0 and non-wage income is 40, find out L.a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none
Marginalist theory of value advanced the view that a commodity's value Multiple Choice is whatever each consumer perceives it to be in a given context is a derivative of its labor costs must be determined by a central authority to prevent gouging and other exploitation is best determined by regulators who can calculate the marginal utility of the commodity
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Using indifference curve analysis, show the effects of an increase in the hourly wage rate on labor supply (hours of work) and earnings. Identify the income and substitution effects.
According to the Economics Policy Institute (Mishel and Wolfe, 2019) CEO pay has grown 940% since 1978 while the compensation of the average worker has only risen 12%. While you can easily find sources that provide statistics that conflict with these numbers, you would be hard pressed to find any credible source that refutes the idea that the rate of pay of CEO’s and other upper-level managers has not dramatically increased relative to an organization’s lower-level employees in just about any 10 or more year period over the past 60 years. In the world of Adam Smith, the “invisible hand” of the free market capitalistic model would address inequities/out of balances. Are the forces represented by the “invisible hand” working? Why or why not? Is there an ethical dimension to the discussion of upper-level manager compensation? Why or why not? How does (or does it?) levels of pay of upper management impact the rest of us commoners?
Suppose that Boston consumers pay twice as much hours as she wants at a wage of w, chooses to work 10 hours a day. Her Boss decides to limit the number of hours that she can work to 8 hours per day. Show how her budget constraints and choice of hours change. Is she unambiguously worse off as a result of this change? Why?
Mark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.