Consider an individual who initially works T-Lo hours per week, where (T-Lo)>0. They earn an hourly wage (W) and no non-labour income. a) Draw a graph that reflects this individual's income- leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (Uo) and choice of leisure hours (Lo). b) The government then implements a wage subsidy program in which worker wages are increased by 10%. This wage subsidy program has no limits, so there is no phase-in/out. This wage subsidy produces both an income effect and a substitution effect on the worker's choice of leisure hours. Assume that the substitution effect is stronger than the income effect. On the same graph as part a, draw this individual's new income-leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (Us) and choice of leisure hours (Ls). [Note: When incorporating the 10% wage subsidy into the graph in part b, I am not expecting perfect precision. Just try your best to draw the new income- leisure constraint as though a 10% wage subsidy has been added.]

Consider an individual who initially works T-Lo hours per week, where (T-Lo)>0. They earn an hourly wage (W) and no non-labour income. a) Draw a graph that reflects this individual's income- leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (Uo) and choice of leisure hours (Lo). b) The government then implements a wage subsidy program in which worker wages are increased by 10%. This wage subsidy program has no limits, so there is no phase-in/out. This wage subsidy produces both an income effect and a substitution effect on the worker's choice of leisure hours. Assume that the substitution effect is stronger than the income effect. On the same graph as part a, draw this individual's new income-leisure constraint, utility-maximizing indifference curve (Us) and choice of leisure hours (Ls). [Note: When incorporating the 10% wage subsidy into the graph in part b, I am not expecting perfect precision. Just try your best to draw the new income- leisure constraint as though a 10% wage subsidy has been added.]

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jones, without a job or job prospects, has been on social assistance for the past four months. Social assistance pays a basic benefit of $600 a month with a benefit reduction rate of 75 percent for earned income. Her welfare benefit is given as B = 600 - 0.75E, where E represents monthly earnings. Jones has just been offered a part-time job working 5 hours a day, 5 days a week, earning an hourly wage of $11. Sketch a budget constraint for Jones given the social assistance scheme in place and the wage rate available for part time work. How much income would she earn if she accepted the job? Would Jones still be on social assistance if she took the job? Draw the budget constraint.
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Using indifference curve analysis, show the effects of an increase in the hourly wage rate on labor supply (hours of work) and earnings. Identify the income and substitution effects.
just subparts g and h
In any given week, Anne receives satisfaction only from the consumption of goods and from the consumption of leisure L, which is measured in hours. Obviously, Anne consumes many different types of goods, but for simplicity we aggregate the dollar value of all the goods that she consumes during the week and call it C. Assume that if Anne chooses to work, the hourly wage rate is w=9 and she has to sleep 8 hours per day. (Sleeping time is not considered leisure.) Potentially, if she wants, she can work up to 7 days a week.
Mark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.
Consider a worker who consumes one good and has a preference for leisure. She maximizes the utility function u(x, L) = xL, where a represents consumption of the good and L represents leisure. Suppose that this worker can choose any L = [0, 1], and receives income w(1 L); w represents the wage rate. Let p denote the price of the consumption good. In addition to her wage income, the worker also has a fixed income of y ≥ 0. (a) Write down the utility maximization problem for this consumer. (b) Find the Marshallian demands for the consumption good and leisure. (c) Find the indirect utility as a function of p, w, and y.
QUESTION 7: Budget constraints Everyone is endowed with 168 hours in a week (24X7). If you work 40 hours or less, you w=$20 per hour. If you work overtime, you earn w-$25. Assume the worker has M= non-labor income and that the price of the consumption good is p. Draw the budget constraint. Label the intercepts and the slopes in both the overtime and non-overtime region.
Only typed answer