Each year the United States considers renewal of Most Favored Nation (MFN) trading status with Farland (a mythical nation). Historically, legislators have made threats of not renewing MFN status because of human rights abuses in Farland. The non-renewal of MFN trading status is likely to involve some retaliatory measures by Farland. The payoff table below shows the potential economic gains associated with a game in which Farland may impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms and the United States may not renew MFN status with Farland. The table contains the dollar value of all trade-flow benefits to the United States and Farland United States Dont renew MFN status with Farland Farland Impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms U.S. trade value $65 b. Farland trade value = $75 b Do not impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms U.S. trade value = $140 b Farland trade value = $5 b U.S. trade value = $35 b U.S. trade value $130 b Renew MFN status with Farland Farland trade value $285 b Farland trade value = $275 b Refer to Table 17-27. If both countries follow a dominant Strategy, the value of trade flow benefits for Farland will be

Each year the United States considers renewal of Most Favored Nation (MFN) trading status with Farland (a mythical nation). Historically, legislators have made threats of not renewing MFN status because of human rights abuses in Farland. The non-renewal of MFN trading status is likely to involve some retaliatory measures by Farland. The payoff table below shows the potential economic gains associated with a game in which Farland may impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms and the United States may not renew MFN status with Farland. The table contains the dollar value of all trade-flow benefits to the United States and Farland United States Dont renew MFN status with Farland Farland Impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms U.S. trade value $65 b. Farland trade value = $75 b Do not impose trade sanctions against U.S. firms U.S. trade value = $140 b Farland trade value = $5 b U.S. trade value = $35 b U.S. trade value $130 b Renew MFN status with Farland Farland trade value $285 b Farland trade value = $275 b Refer to Table 17-27. If both countries follow a dominant Strategy, the value of trade flow benefits for Farland will be

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

THE PRISONERS' DILEMMA Consider the following simple model of a cocktail party. Alice and Bob are carrying on separate conversations at the party. Alice speaks at volume a and Bob speaks at volume b. The communication benefit to Alice is al(a + b) and the benefit to Bob is b/(a + b). The vocal-strain cost to Alice is ca and the cost to Bob is cb, where c is a parameter. Suppose that the players have two choices: speaking softly at volume 1, or speaking loudly at volume 4. This leads to the following game in strategic form, with Alice choosing the row and Bob choosing the column. a = 1 a = 4 b = 1 0.5-c, 0.5-c 0.8-4c, 0.2-c 0.0400 0.0500 0.0750 0.0800 0.1500 b = 4 0.2 c, 0.8-4c - 0.54c, 0.5-4c For which of the following values of c is this game a prisoners' dilemma? (Mark all values for which this is true.)
Player 1 can stay at home or fly to New York, in which case Player 2 can meet Player 1, who can then buy a drink for Player 2. See the game below. Which of the following completely describes a possible strategy for Player 1? 1 Fly to New York Stay home Stay home Stay home and Don't buy drink Fly to New York and Meet Stay home or Fly to New York 2 Meet Don't meet 0,0 1 Buy drink Don't buy drink -2,0 1,2 -1, -1
One game-theoretic explanation for why the United States never saw a widespread, coordinated lockdown to stop the spread of COVID-19 is that each state benefited from remaining open when its neighbors closed. Thus, the Nash equilibrium was for some states to remain open while others closed down. What kind of game best describes this situation? Anti-coordination game All of these categories could describe the situation. Repeated game Prisoners' Dilemma Coordination game
The concept of a Nash equilibrium, when applied to an oligopoly, relies on the notion that Firm A in an oligopoly chooses its own best strategy based on which consideration? based on the strategies that other firms have chosen based on the knowledge that other firms are likely to choose their strategies in response to Firm A's choice of a strategy based on the objective of maximizing the collective profits of all firms in the industry based on the internal financial information of Firm A
Consider the following simplified scenario. Imagine that the Australian national rugby union (for short, Rugby AU) has exclusive rights to organize the games played by the national team. Rugby AU decides that the next match, between the Wallabies and the All Blacks (i.e., the Australian and the New Zeeland national rugby teams), will be hosted at the Marvel Stadium in Melbourne. Rugby AU has no fixed costs for organizing the game, but it must pay a marginal cost MC of $20 per seat to the owners of the Marvel Stadium. Two types of tickets will be sold for the game: concession and full fare. Based on any official document that attests to their age, children and pensioners qualify to purchase concession tickets that offer a discounted price; everyone else pays the full fare. The demand for full-fare tickets is QF(P) = 120 – 2P. The demand for concession tickets is QC(P) = 80 – 2P. 1. The market for full fare tickets (F)a) Calculate the inverse demand, write the profit maximizing…
Two countries decide to specialize in producing certain goods to export to other countries, and in return they import different goods from these other countries. The advantage of these exports and imports is: Group of answer choices the country will be able to produce at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the country will be able to consume at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the countries will be able to produce and consume at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the country's production possibilities frontier will shift outward.
two timber companies, Alpha and Beta, have to decide whether to harvest timber from the North Hill or the South Hill and then sell the timbers in the same market. If both harvest from North Hill, each company can harvest 100 tons of timber. If both companies harvest from South Hill, each company can harvest 150 tons of timber. If one company harvests from North Hill and the other harvests from South Hill, the company at North Hill can harvest 150 tons of timber while the company at South Hill can harvest 250 tons of timber. The price of timber is dependent on the total supply of timber in the market. The price will be $180 per ton if the total supply is 200 tons, $150 per ton if the total supply is 300 tons and $100 per ton if the total supply is 400 tons. To both companies, the cost of harvesting in North Hill is $5,000 and the cost of harvesting in South Hill is $10,000. (a) If Alpha and Beta were to make a decision simultaneously, construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for…
Consider a Bertrand game between two firms. The demand for firm 1's product is given by q1 = 100 - 3p1 + 2p2. The demand for firm 2's product is given by q2 100- 3p2 +2p1. In terms of notation, p1 is the price of firm 1's product and pa is the price of firm 2's product. The two firms choose their prices simultaneously. For your calculations below, assume zero costs and that prices are measured in dollars per unit. Find the equilibrium prices. as b Derive the firms' best-response functions and explain whether the prices are strategic substitutes or complements in this game.
There are two oil producers, Saudi Arabia and Iran (these are countries which we are treating as players in this example). The market price will be $60/barrel if the total volume of sales is 9 million barrels daily, $50 if the total volume of sales is 11 million barrels daily, and $35 if the total volume of sales is 13 million barrels daily. Saudi Arabia has two strategies; either produce 8 million barrels daily or 6 million. Iran has two strategies; either produce 3 million barrels daily or 5 million. Assume for simplicity that marginal cost of production is zero for both countries. Here is the normal form representation of this game (where Saudi Arabia and Iran are players, they can choose strategies over what quantity to produce and they face payoffs in terms of profits). Note that the following paragraph is simply an explanation of this representation of the game. If you are already comfortable with the structure, feel free to skip to the questions below the horizontal line…
Consider a simple example of a payoff matrix in the context of a trade dispute between two countries, Country A and Country B. In this scenario, both countries can either choose to impose tariffs (T) or not impose tariffs (N) on each other's exports. The payoffs that each country experiences are based on the chosen strategies and are presented below. (a) Does Country A and B have a dominant strategy? If so, specify its dominant strategy and explain your answer clearly.(b) What is the Nash equilibrium. Explain your answer clearly.(c) Suppose now the trade dispute is played sequentially, with Country B moving first. Represent the trade dispute in and extensive form.(d) Is this trade dispute a prisoner's dilemma game? Explain your answer.
The inverse market demand for fax paper is given by P=100-Q. There are two firms who produce fax paper. Firm 1 has a cost of production of C1= 15*Q1 and firm 2 has a cost of production of C2=20*Q2 a) Suppose that firm play a Stackelberg game. First firm 1 sets the quantity in t=1, then, knowing which quantityfirm 1 has set, firm 2 chooses the quantity in t=2. What are the Stackelberg quantities and prices? What arethe profits od firm 1 and 2? Compared to part a) which firm benefits and which firm loses?
You manage a company that competes in an industry that is comprised of 3 equal-sized firms that produce similar products. A recent industry report indicates that the market is fairly saturated, in that a 10 percent industry-wide price increase would lead to a 22 percent decline in units sold by all firms in the industry. Currently, Congress is considering legislation that would impose a tariff on a key input used by the industry. Your best estimate is that, if the legislation passes, your marginal cost will increase by 1 dollar. Based on this information, what price increase would you recommend if the tariff legislation is passed by Congress? Instructions: Enter your response rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places).