Does 10K running time decrease when the runner listens to music? Nine runners were timed as they ran a 10K with and without listening to music. The running times in minutes are shown below. Running Time 46 44 58 44 44 57 37 41 48 With Music Ho: Select an answer ✓ H₁: Select an answer Without Music Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: 43 47 61 43 49 64 39 42 54 Select an answer V Select an answer V = Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? c. The p-value = d. The p-value is ? ✓ a e. Based on this, we should [Select an answer the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean running time with music is less than the population mean running time without music. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the nine runners finished in less time on average with music compared to running without music. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean running time with music is less than the population mean running time without music.

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
### Analyzing the Effect of Music on 10K Running Times

This study aims to determine whether listening to music affects 10K running times. Nine runners were timed running a 10K with and without music. Their times in minutes are as follows:

| Running Time |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
|--------------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
| **With Music**      | 46 | 44 | 58 | 44 | 57 | 37 | 41 | 47 | 48 |
| **Without Music**   | 43 | 47 | 61 | 43 | 49 | 64 | 39 | 42 | 54 |

Assuming a normal distribution, the study uses a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.10 \).

#### Hypothesis Testing Instructions

a. **The Null and Alternative Hypotheses** would be defined based on mean running times:

- \( H_0: \mu_{\text{with music}} = \mu_{\text{without music}} \)
- \( H_1: \mu_{\text{with music}} < \mu_{\text{without music}} \)

b. **Calculate the Test Statistic**:
   - Enter the computed value showing 3 decimal places.

c. **Determine the p-value**:
   - Show the calculated result to 4 decimal places.

d. **Compare the p-value to \( \alpha \)**:
   - Determine whether the p-value is less than or equal to \( \alpha \).

e. **Decision Rule**:
   - Decide to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the p-value comparison.

f. **Conclusion**:
   - Choose the final conclusion based on the statistical analysis:
     - If results are statistically significant: Conclude the effect of music on reducing running time.
     - If not statistically significant: Conclude that there is insufficient evidence to show music reduces running time.

By following these steps and completing the calculations, conclusions about the effect of music on running time can be drawn.
Transcribed Image Text:### Analyzing the Effect of Music on 10K Running Times This study aims to determine whether listening to music affects 10K running times. Nine runners were timed running a 10K with and without music. Their times in minutes are as follows: | Running Time | | | | | | | | | | |--------------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| | **With Music** | 46 | 44 | 58 | 44 | 57 | 37 | 41 | 47 | 48 | | **Without Music** | 43 | 47 | 61 | 43 | 49 | 64 | 39 | 42 | 54 | Assuming a normal distribution, the study uses a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.10 \). #### Hypothesis Testing Instructions a. **The Null and Alternative Hypotheses** would be defined based on mean running times: - \( H_0: \mu_{\text{with music}} = \mu_{\text{without music}} \) - \( H_1: \mu_{\text{with music}} < \mu_{\text{without music}} \) b. **Calculate the Test Statistic**: - Enter the computed value showing 3 decimal places. c. **Determine the p-value**: - Show the calculated result to 4 decimal places. d. **Compare the p-value to \( \alpha \)**: - Determine whether the p-value is less than or equal to \( \alpha \). e. **Decision Rule**: - Decide to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the p-value comparison. f. **Conclusion**: - Choose the final conclusion based on the statistical analysis: - If results are statistically significant: Conclude the effect of music on reducing running time. - If not statistically significant: Conclude that there is insufficient evidence to show music reduces running time. By following these steps and completing the calculations, conclusions about the effect of music on running time can be drawn.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON