9Document DSource: Adapted from: "Can't Believe It: Reaction to Casey Anthony Verdict," NBC News and msnbc.com, July 5, 2011.Note: In 2008, a two-year-old Florida girl named Caylee Anthony was killed. Her mother, Casey Anthony, was arrestedand tried for her murder. The trial was televised and gained extraordinary media attention throughout the country.Casey Anthony was presumed guilty by many in the public. The large majority of those in the public who followedthe story were shocked when a jury found Casey Anthony not guilty of the murder. While the 25-year-old motherwas found not guilty, she was convicted of four counts of lying to investigators.ORLANDO, Fla. - Inside and outside a Florida courtroom, the jury's verdict in the CaseyAnthony trial left many stunned, outraged or relieved Tuesday....Angela Wright, of Elkhart, Indiana. "I can't believe it. I'm shocked. Oh my God, I can'tbelieve it."Janine Gonzalez who lives a few miles from the Anthony home in Orange County. "Where'sjustice for Caylee? Do you mean to tell me that in Florida you can kill your child, tossher on the side of the road and go free? She (Casey Anthony) better move and move to afaraway place."•Lawson Lamar, Florida State Attorney. "We're disappointed in the verdict today becausewe know the facts and we've put in absolutely every piece of evidence that existed.... Thisis a dry-bones case. Very, very difficult to prove. The delay in recovering little Caylee'sremains worked to our considerable disadvantage."Jose Baez, Casey's defense lawyer. "While we're happy for Casey, there are no winnersin this case," Baez said at a news conference afterward. "Caylee has passed on far, far toosoon. And what my driving force has been for the last three years has been always to makesure that there has been justice for Caylee and Casey, because Casey did not murder Cay-lee. It's that simple."• Joe Adamson, an Orlando businessman. "I think it is really great that we have science, butwe also have common sense," Adamson told the Sentinel. "These guys (jurors) didn't buyinto science fiction."Document Analysis1. Which speakers seemed to agree with the verdict? Which seemed to disagree?2. What did the Florida State's Attorney mean when he said that the case was very difficult to provebecause it was a "dry-bones" case?3. What do you think Joe Adamson, the businessman who commented on the case, meant when hesaid, "The guys (jurors) didn't buy into science fiction"?4. How can you use this document to argue for keeping the jury trial system?5. How can you use this document to argue for the bench trial system?EV295

Since you have assigned a question with multiple sub-parts, I will only provide the solution to the…

Document Analysis 1. Which speakers seemed to agree with the verdict? Which seemed to disagree? 2. What did the Florida State's Attorney mean when he said that the case was very difficult to prove because it was a "dry-bones" case? 3. What do you think Joe Adamson, the businessman who commented on the case, meant when he said, "The guys (jurors) didn't buy into science fiction"?

Document Analysis 1. Which speakers seemed to agree with the verdict? Which seemed to disagree? 2. What did the Florida State's Attorney mean when he said that the case was very difficult to prove because it was a "dry-bones" case? 3. What do you think Joe Adamson, the businessman who commented on the case, meant when he said, "The guys (jurors) didn't buy into science fiction"?