Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Do: Chapter 10 End-of-Chapter Problems 5. Gravetter/Wallnau/Forzano, - Chapter 10 - End-of-chapter question 9 Does posting calorie content for menu items affect people's choices in fast-food restaurants? According to results obtained by Elbel, Gyamfi, and Kersh (2011), the answer is no. The researchers monitored the calorie content of food purchases for children and adolescents in four large fast-food chains before and after mandatory labeling began in New York City. Although most of the adolescents reported noticing the calorie labels, apparently the labels had no effect on their choices. Data similar to the results obtained show an average of M = 786 calories per meal with s = 85 for n = 100 children and adolescents before the labeling, compared to an average of M = 772 calories with s = 91 for a similar sample of n = 100 after the mandatory posting. Use a two-tailed test with a = .05 to determine whether the mean number of calories after the posting is significantly different than before calorie content was posted. (Use a t Distributions table to find the critical values of t.) O Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. O Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. O Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. Calculate r? to measure effect size for the mean difference. O 0.0063 or 0.63% O 0.0053 or 0.53% O 0.0073 or 0.73%

Do: Chapter 10 End-of-Chapter Problems 5. Gravetter/Wallnau/Forzano, - Chapter 10 - End-of-chapter question 9 Does posting calorie content for menu items affect people's choices in fast-food restaurants? According to results obtained by Elbel, Gyamfi, and Kersh (2011), the answer is no. The researchers monitored the calorie content of food purchases for children and adolescents in four large fast-food chains before and after mandatory labeling began in New York City. Although most of the adolescents reported noticing the calorie labels, apparently the labels had no effect on their choices. Data similar to the results obtained show an average of M = 786 calories per meal with s = 85 for n = 100 children and adolescents before the labeling, compared to an average of M = 772 calories with s = 91 for a similar sample of n = 100 after the mandatory posting. Use a two-tailed test with a = .05 to determine whether the mean number of calories after the posting is significantly different than before calorie content was posted. (Use a t Distributions table to find the critical values of t.) O Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. O Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. O Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. Calculate r? to measure effect size for the mean difference. O 0.0063 or 0.63% O 0.0053 or 0.53% O 0.0073 or 0.73%

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
**Chapter 10 End-of-Chapter Problems** **5. Gravetter/Wallnau/Forzano, - Chapter 10 - End-of-Chapter Question 9** Does posting calorie content for menu items affect people’s choices in fast-food restaurants? According to results obtained by Elbel, Gyamfi, and Kersh (2011), the answer is no. The researchers monitored the calorie content of food purchases for children and adolescents in four large fast-food chains before and after mandatory labeling began in New York City. Although most of the adolescents reported noticing the calorie labels, apparently the labels had no effect on their choices. Data similar to the results obtained show an average of M = 786 calories per meal with s = 85 for n = 100 children and adolescents before the labeling, compared to an average of M = 772 calories with s = 91 for a similar sample of n = 100 after the mandatory posting. Use a two-tailed test with α = .05 to determine whether the mean number of calories after the posting is significantly different than before calorie content was posted. (Use a t Distributions table to find the critical values of t.) - ○ Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. - ○ Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. - ○ Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. Calculate r² to measure effect size for the mean difference. - ○ 0.0063 or 0.63% - ○ 0.0053 or 0.53% - ○ 0.0073 or 0.73%
Transcribed Image Text:**Chapter 10 End-of-Chapter Problems** **5. Gravetter/Wallnau/Forzano, - Chapter 10 - End-of-Chapter Question 9** Does posting calorie content for menu items affect people’s choices in fast-food restaurants? According to results obtained by Elbel, Gyamfi, and Kersh (2011), the answer is no. The researchers monitored the calorie content of food purchases for children and adolescents in four large fast-food chains before and after mandatory labeling began in New York City. Although most of the adolescents reported noticing the calorie labels, apparently the labels had no effect on their choices. Data similar to the results obtained show an average of M = 786 calories per meal with s = 85 for n = 100 children and adolescents before the labeling, compared to an average of M = 772 calories with s = 91 for a similar sample of n = 100 after the mandatory posting. Use a two-tailed test with α = .05 to determine whether the mean number of calories after the posting is significantly different than before calorie content was posted. (Use a t Distributions table to find the critical values of t.) - ○ Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. - ○ Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. - ○ Fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there was no significant change in calorie consumption after the mandatory posting. Calculate r² to measure effect size for the mean difference. - ○ 0.0063 or 0.63% - ○ 0.0053 or 0.53% - ○ 0.0073 or 0.73%
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 4 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS