6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcomeSuppose there are only two firms that sell tablets: Padmania and Capturesque. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars)each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its tablets.Padmania Pricingfirms.HighLowCapturesque PricingLow4, 137,7For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Padmania prices low and Capturesque prices high, Padmania will earn a profit of $13 million, andCapturesque will earn profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Padmania and Capturesque are both profit-maximizingHigh8,813,4If Padmania prices high, Capturesque will make more profit if it chooses aprofit if it chooses aprice.If Capturesque prices high, Padmania will make more profit if it chooses aprofit if it chooses aprice.Considering all of the information given, pricing lowIf the firms do not collude, what strategies will they end up choosing?TruehighBoth Padmania and Capturesque will choose a low price.lowprice, and if Padmania prices low, Capturesque will make morea dominant strategy for both Padmania and Capturesque.price, and if Capturesque prices low, Padmania will make more.O Padmania will choose a high price, and Capturesque will choose a low price.OBoth Padmania and Capturesque will choose a high price.O Padmania will choose a low price, and Capturesque will choose a high price.True or False: The game between Padmania and Capturesque is not an example of the prisoners' dilemma. 6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcomeSuppose there are only two firms that sell tablets: Padmania and Capturesque. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars)each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its tablets.Padmania PricingHighLowCapturesque PricingHighLOW8,813,44, 137,7For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Padmania prices low and Capturesque prices high, Padmania will earn a profit of $13 million, andCapturesque will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Padmania and Capturesque are both profit-maximizingfirms.If Padmania prices high, Capturesque will make more profit if it chooses aprofit if it chooses aprice.If Capturesque prices high, Padmania will make more profit if it chooses aprofit if it chooses a▼price.Considering all of the information given, pricing lowIf the firms do not collude, what strategies will they end up choosing?a dominant strategy for both Padmania and Capturesque.Both Padmania and Capturesque will choose a low price.Trueprice, and if Padmania prices low, Capturesque will make moreO Padmania will choose a high price, and Capturesque will choose a low price.OBoth Padmania and Capturesque will choose a high price.price, and if Capturesque prices low, Padmania will make morePadmania will choose a low price, and Capturesque will choose a high price.True or False: The game between Padmania and Capturesque is not an example of the prisoners' dilemma.

Prisoner's Dilemma: Prisoner's Dilemma is an instance in game theory where 2 arobbers, questioned on…

dmania Pricing High Low Capturesque Pricing High Low 8,8 13,4 4, 13 7,7 mple, the lower-left cell shows that if Padmania prices low and Capturesque prices high, Padmania will earn a profit of $13 million, and esque will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Padmania and Capturesque are both profit-maximizing hania prices high, Capturesque will make more profit if it chooses a it chooses a price. high uresque prices high, Padmania will make more profit if it chooses a it chooses a price. ering all of the information given, pricing low rms do not collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? low price, and if Padmania prices low, Capturesque will make more a dominant strategy for both Padmania and Capturesque. Both Padmania and Capturesque will choose a high price. price, and if Capturesque prices low, Padmania will make more OPadmania will choose a high price, and Capturesque will choose a low price. OBoth Padmania and Capturesque will choose a low price. O Padmania will choose a low price, and Capturesque will choose a high price. False: The game between Padmania and Capturesque is not an example of the prisoners' dilemma.

dmania Pricing High Low Capturesque Pricing High Low 8,8 13,4 4, 13 7,7 mple, the lower-left cell shows that if Padmania prices low and Capturesque prices high, Padmania will earn a profit of $13 million, and esque will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Padmania and Capturesque are both profit-maximizing hania prices high, Capturesque will make more profit if it chooses a it chooses a price. high uresque prices high, Padmania will make more profit if it chooses a it chooses a price. ering all of the information given, pricing low rms do not collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? low price, and if Padmania prices low, Capturesque will make more a dominant strategy for both Padmania and Capturesque. Both Padmania and Capturesque will choose a high price. price, and if Capturesque prices low, Padmania will make more OPadmania will choose a high price, and Capturesque will choose a low price. OBoth Padmania and Capturesque will choose a low price. O Padmania will choose a low price, and Capturesque will choose a high price. False: The game between Padmania and Capturesque is not an example of the prisoners' dilemma.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

aepioymentld=598281800483229979995799&elSBN=9780357133606&id%3D1061548135&snapshotld%32200166& 6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smartphones: Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low High 11, 11 2, 15 Flashfone Pricing Low 15, 2 8, 8 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $15 million, and Pictech will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses ▼ price. a If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a price, and…
6
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
3. Nash Equilibria Consider the following (normal-form) game. Compute a Nash Equilibrium of this game. U C D L | M R 5,0 1,3 4,0 2,4 1,4 3,5 0,1 1,0 5,0
Consider the attached game depicted in Normal Form. Find one Nash equilibrium and verify that it is a Nash equilibrium. Note: 1. Remember to express the Nash equilibrium in the form of a strategy profile. 2. Use the definition of Nash equilibrium to verify that the strategy profile you find is really a Nash equilibrium.
am. 112.
For the game given, use the best-reply method to find the Nash equilibria.
4. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing High Low Warmbreeze Pricing High Low 11, 11 2,13 13, 2 10, 10 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $13 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. Considering all of the…
UofC Aggressive Restrained Aggressive 18, 26 29,47 MRU Restrained 45, 59 32, 23 Consider the case of a Sequential-Move game. Uofc moves First Part 1. Is UofC 's sub-game Perfect Nash Equilibrium strategy Aggressive or Restrained? (Answer 1 for aggressive and 2 for Restrained) 1 Part 2. Is MRU's sub-game Perfect Nash Equilibrium strategy Aggressive or Restrained? (Answer 1 for aggressive and 2 for Restrained) Number: Part 3. How much profit does UofC make under the Sub-game perfect Nash-Equilibrium? Number Part 4. How much profit does MRU make under the Sub-game perfect Nash-Equilibrium? Number
6.
Question 5 Consider following extensive form game Keep Prices (8,2) Advertise Lower Prices (4,6) O Advertise; Lower Prices Firm 1 O Advertise; Keep Prices Firm 2 O Not Advertise; Keep Prices Not Advertise The subgame perfect Nash-equilibrium is O Not Advertise; Lower Prices Keep Prices (6,10) O Lower Prices (3,7) 5 pts
Consider a country with balanced trade. Using the table below, determine the quantity of financial capital demanded. GDP $100 billion Consumption $65 billion Taxes minus Transfers $15 billion Government purchases $20 billion $15 billion $25 billion $10 billion $20 billion