5 Think back to Econ 201, oligopolies, and game theory. Use the figure below to answer the following questions. The figure shows a payoff matrix for two firms, A andB, that must choose between a high-price strategy and a low-price strategy. Both firms setting a high price is not a Nash equilibrium because:Payoff MatrixFirm BLowHighPricePriceLow10Price1025High2520Price1520O neither firm can improve its payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price.O both firms can improve their payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price.O setting a high price is the dominant strategy for each firm.O there is no dominant strategy for either firm.Firm A

Dominant strategy: its a strategy that gives maximum payoff to a player irrespective of what other…

Think back to Econ 201, oligopolies, and game theory. Use the figure below to answer the following questions. The figure shows a payoff matrix for two firms, A and B, that must choose between a high-price strategy and a low-price strategy. Both firms setting a high price is not a Nash equilibrium because: Payoff Matrix Firm B Low High Price Price Low 10 Price 10 25 High 25 20 Price 20 O neither firm can improve its payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price. O both firms can improve their payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price. O setting a high price is the dominant strategy for each firm. O there is no dominant strategy for either firm. Firm A

Think back to Econ 201, oligopolies, and game theory. Use the figure below to answer the following questions. The figure shows a payoff matrix for two firms, A and B, that must choose between a high-price strategy and a low-price strategy. Both firms setting a high price is not a Nash equilibrium because: Payoff Matrix Firm B Low High Price Price Low 10 Price 10 25 High 25 20 Price 20 O neither firm can improve its payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price. O both firms can improve their payoff by setting a low price given that the other firm is setting a high price. O setting a high price is the dominant strategy for each firm. O there is no dominant strategy for either firm. Firm A

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter26: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Find any Nash equilibria in the game below. Firm B Co-operate Don’t co-operate Firm A Co-operate 60 60 0 80 Don’t co-operate 80 0 10 10 a. There is one Nash equilibrium: both firms don't co-operate. b. There are no Nash equilibria. c. There are two Nash equilibria: one firm co-operates and the other firm doesn't co-operate. d. There are two Nash equilibria: (i) both firms co-operate and (ii) both firms don't co-operate.
Find any Nash equilibria in the game below. Firm B Co-operate Don’t co-operate Firm A Co-operate 60 60 0 80 Don’t co-operate 80 0 10 10 Answer a. There is one Nash equilibrium: both firms don't co-operate. b. There are no Nash equilibria. c. There are two Nash equilibria: one firm co-operates and the other firm doesn't co-operate. d. There are two Nash equilibria: (i) both firms co-operate and (ii) both firms don't co-operate.
Economics Alpha and Beta are the only firms selling gyros in the upscale town of Delphi. Each firm must decide on whether to offer a discount to students to compete for customers. If one firm offers a discount but the other does not then the firm that offers the discount will increase its profit. The figure shows the payoff matrix for this game. Alpha Offer Don't offer Alpha eams S60,000 Alpha eams $20,000 What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Offer Bota earns $60,000 Bota earns $100.000 O A. There is no Nash equilibrium Beta Alpha earns $100.000 Alpha earms $80,000 O B. Beta offers a student discount but Alpha does not Don't OC. Both Alpha and Beta offer a student discount Beta eams $20,000 Beta earns $80,000 offer O D. Alpha offers a student discount but Beta does not
Imagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.
The attached diagram depicts two firms controlled by Jacob and Elsa, and two potential actions each firm might take. Payoffs from action combinations appear in the normal-form depiction of the game played by Jacob and Elsa. What is the Nash equilibrium of the game (Jacob's strategy listed first)? a b Jacob's Actions d Dont' Advertise Advertise, Advertise Advertise Don't Advertise J=300 J=400 Don't advertise, Don't advertise Elsa's Actions Don't advertise (Jacob), Advertise (Elsa) с Advertise (Jacob), Don't Advertise (Elsa) E=200 Selected answer will be automatically saved. For keyboard navigation, press up/down arrow keys to select an answer. E=50 Advertise J=100 J=200 E=300 E=100
Two firms operating in the same market must decide between charging a high price or a low price. The Payoffs are as below. Firm A's profit is listed before the comma, B's profit after the comma. Firm B Firm A Low Price High Price Low Price 16, 17 7, 28 High Price 28, 7 22, 22 If each firm tries to choose a price that is optimal, regardless of the other firm's price, what is the Nash equilibrium? Does either firm have a dominant strategy?
Use the following normal-form game to answer the following questions. a. For what values of x is strategy D (strictly) dominant for player 2? b. For what values of x is strategy B (strictly) dominant for player 1? c. For what values of x is (B, D) the only Nash equilibrium of the game?
GAME THEORY: Two countries produce oil. The per unit production cost of Country 1 is C1 = $2 and of country 2 it is C2 = $4. The total demand for oil is Q = 40-p where p is the market price of a unit of oil. Each country can only produce either 5 units, 10 units or 15 units. The total production of the two countries in a Nash equilibrium is: A. 10 B. 15 C. 20 D. 25 E. 30
Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smart phones, Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low Flashfone Pricing High 11, 11 2, 18 Low 18, 2 10, 10 For example, the lower, left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $18 million and Pictech will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a ______ price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a _____ price. If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a _____ price, and if Pictech prices low, Flashfone will make more…
Consider the game in the table below. Find the Nash Equilibrium of the game. Add the payoffs of both players at the Nash Equilibrum and enter that number. Firm A Left Right Firm B Up 8,10 5,6 Down 5,10 8,8
Economics Consider two firms that are choosing the price of competing products. The choices are contained in the payoff table. Each firm can raise price, lower price, or maintain their price. Suppose the game is played once each period forever. If both players play the strategy "always lower price" is this a Nash equilibrium? Let b = discount rate, 0 < b <1. Raise price Maintain price Lower price Firm B Raise price Maintain price Lower price 6. 4 8. 8 1.1 5, 5 4, 6 7.2 1.1 3.3 Firm A 2.7 No. because it is dominated by raising the price. No, because it is dominated by both firms raising the price. No, because it is dominated by maintaining the price. Yes.
#3. Characterize the unique subgame-perfect equilibrium in the following game. Can you find any Nash equilibrium which is not subgame perfect? Explain. D R D (1,1,1)) R D N-1 N-1' N-1' D **** N-1 R D R (2,2,..., 2)