Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Discussion: 1. Compare the two lines on your graph. Discuss where the preparation/takeoff, flight, and landing phases take place. 2. Comment on the similarities and differences between your results. Which method do you think is the most accurate representation of jump height? 3. Discuss 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage for each of the three methods. Consider time, resources/equipment available, etc.

Discussion: 1. Compare the two lines on your graph. Discuss where the preparation/takeoff, flight, and landing phases take place. 2. Comment on the similarities and differences between your results. Which method do you think is the most accurate representation of jump height? 3. Discuss 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage for each of the three methods. Consider time, resources/equipment available, etc.

Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

theres no missing information... the table is right there... and the chart is right there... the black spots on the table are black because they are not relevant to any of the questions.........

Figure 1. Vertical ground reaction force and hip marker vertical position over time. Vertical GRFZ and Hip Marker Vertical Position vs Time Comparison Vertical GRFz (N) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 kk -0.2 0.0000 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000 -500 0 Time (seconds) Impulse (NS) Time to Peak Height (s) Takeoff Velocity (m/s) Jump Height (m) Discussion: 1.6 -1.4 Method 130.00 1.76 m/s 0.16 m 1.2 Table 1. Jump height calculated using three different methods Impulse-Momentum Time in the Air Method -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 Hip Maker Vertical Position (m) -GRFZ (N) Hip marker vertical position (m) 0.27 s 2.65 m/s 0.36 m Motion Capture Method 0.43 m 1. Compare the two lines on your graph. Discuss where the preparation/takeoff, flight, and landing phases take place. 2. Comment on the similarities and differences between your results. Which method do you think is the most accurate representation of jump height? 3. Discuss 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage for each of the three methods. Consider time, resources/equipment available, etc.
Transcribed Image Text:Figure 1. Vertical ground reaction force and hip marker vertical position over time. Vertical GRFZ and Hip Marker Vertical Position vs Time Comparison Vertical GRFz (N) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 kk -0.2 0.0000 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000 -500 0 Time (seconds) Impulse (NS) Time to Peak Height (s) Takeoff Velocity (m/s) Jump Height (m) Discussion: 1.6 -1.4 Method 130.00 1.76 m/s 0.16 m 1.2 Table 1. Jump height calculated using three different methods Impulse-Momentum Time in the Air Method -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 Hip Maker Vertical Position (m) -GRFZ (N) Hip marker vertical position (m) 0.27 s 2.65 m/s 0.36 m Motion Capture Method 0.43 m 1. Compare the two lines on your graph. Discuss where the preparation/takeoff, flight, and landing phases take place. 2. Comment on the similarities and differences between your results. Which method do you think is the most accurate representation of jump height? 3. Discuss 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage for each of the three methods. Consider time, resources/equipment available, etc.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 3 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Project Management Techniques
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS