Devise a divide-and-conquer algorithm that multiplies a matrix A and a matrix B (both of them are n-by-n) in time O(nlo927).This improves over the naive O(n³) algorithm we learned in high school. Your answer should be a clear exposition of the steps needed to perform the multiplication, and also a proof of its runtime. If it helps feel free to assume that n is a power of 2.

Devise a divide-and-conquer algorithm that multiplies a matrix A and a matrix B (both of them are n-by-n) in time O(nlo927).This improves over the naive O(n³) algorithm we learned in high school. Your answer should be a clear exposition of the steps needed to perform the multiplication, and also a proof of its runtime. If it helps feel free to assume that n is a power of 2.

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edition)

7th Edition

ISBN:9780133594140

Author:James Kurose, Keith Ross

Publisher:James Kurose, Keith Ross

Chapter1: Computer Networks And The Internet

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem R1RQ: What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

7. Suppose that you have two different algorithms for solving a problem. To solve a problem of size n, the first algorithm uses exactly n(log2 n) operations and the second algorithm uses exactly n3/2 operations. As n grows, which algorithm uses fewer operations?
Find the running time for each of the following algorithms. Show work by finding a table of values for each while loop, writing the summations, then solving. Be sure to show work on both the upper bound and lower bound, justify the split, and check that the bounds differ by only a constant factor. Use asymptotic notation to write the answer. c) Func4(n) 1 2 3 4 567∞∞ s = 0; for i 1 to 5n do 8 j← 3i; while (j < i³) do s+ s + i - j; j+5 x j; end end 8 return (s);
You want to design an algorithm, called minMax(A,p,r), that takes an array of integers and indexes of the first and last elements, and returns the minimum and maximum values in that range. Now write the pseudo code of a divide and conquer (and therefore, recursive) algorithm with the same time complexity (Θ(n)). You can assume that p ≤ r. Also, in your code, you can return two numbers by returning a pair, e.g. “return (a, b)”, and can save the output in a similar way, e.g. “(a, b) = minMax(parameters)”. (Short answer please)
1. Determine the running time of the following algorithm. Write summations to represent loops and solve using bounding. Be sure to show work on both the upper bound and lower bound, justify the split, and check that the bounds differ by only a constant factor. Use asymptotic notation to write the answer. Func1(n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S← 0; for i ←n to n² do for j← 1 to i do for k9n to 10n² do for mi to k end end end return (s); end s+s + i- j + k −m;
No plagarism please! Correct and detailed answer will be Upvoted else downvoted. Thank you!
Get the time complexity function from the pseudocode for the addition of the 2 matrices below, and prove whether the big-oh is O(n^2) so that it satisfies the rule f(n) <= c g(n) for(i = 0 ; i < rows; i++){for(j = 0; j < columns; j++)matrix2[i][j] = matrix1[i][j] + matrix2[i][j];} for(i = 0 ; i < rows; i++){for(j = 0; j < columns; j++){printf("%d ", matrix2[i][j]);}printf("\n");}
Given an unsorted array A of integers of any size, n ≥ 3, and an integer value x, write an algorithm as a pseudo code (not a program!) that would find out if there exist EXACTLY3 occurrences in the array with value x. What is the time complexity of your algorithm, in terms of Big-O? What is the space complexity of your algorithm, in terms of Big-O? What if , the given array A is sorted. Will time complexity change from the case that A was unsorted? • If yes; give a new algorithm that achieves this better complexity (indicate the time complexity as of that algorithm). • If no, explain why such new constraints/conditions cannot lead to a better time complexity.
Below is pseudocode representing the Compute-Opt algorithm: Compute-Opt(j): If j = 0 then Return 0 Else Return max(vj+Compute-Opt(p(j)), Compute-Opt(j − 1)) Endif Memoization of this algorithm does what to its running time? Group of answer choices It reduces the running time from exponential to linear. It reduces the running time from O(n2) to O(n). It reduces the running time from exponential to O(n log n). It doesn't significantly reduce the running time, but it enables the algorithm to utilize less space.
Question: Design an algorithm for this problem with worst-case runtime of O(n).
Consider array A of n numbers. We want to design a dynamic programming algorithm to find the maximum sum of consecutive numbers with at least one number. Clearly, if all numbers are positive, the maximum will be the sum of all the numbers. On the other hand, if all of them are negative, the maximum will be the largest negative number. The complexity of your dynamic programming algorithm must be O(n2). However, the running time of the most efficient algorithm is O(n). Design the most efficient algorithm you can and answer the following questions based on it. To get the full points you should design the O(n) algorithm. However, if you cannot do that, still answer the following questions based on your algorithm and you will get partial credit. Write the recursion that computes the optimal solution recursively based on the solu- (a) tion(s) to subproblem(s). Briefly explain how it computes the solution. Do not forget the base case(s) of your recursion.
What is the best case scenario? What is the exact number of operations for the best case scenario in terms of n and m? What is the big-oh for the best case scenario? What is the worst case scenario? What is the exact number of operations for the worst case scenario in terms of n and m? What is the big-oh for the worst case scenario? Consider the following algorithm tha finds a row where every entry is x in a 2-D array. Assume that (a) the array has n rows and m columns, and that (b) the comparison on line 3 counts towards the running time.
Consider the following recursive algorithm, where // denotes integer division: 3//2 = 1, 5//2 = 2, etc. F(n):if n <= 1: returnF(n//2)for i from 0 to n for j from 0 to n//2 print(i+j) Let function T(n) denote the running time of this algorithm. Derive T(n) and prove its worst case timecomplexity