Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: H₂: Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic. Survey Results Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Print P-value=(Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two
risky behaviors independent of each other?
Click the icon to view the table of survey results.
Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
H₂:
H₁:
Determine the test statistic.
x² = (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Determine the P-value of the test statistic.
▼
P-value =
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related?
C
Survey Results
Texted While Driving
No Texting While Driving
Print
Drove When Drinking Alcohol?
Yes
No
735
151
Done
3036
4489
X
O A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.
O B. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.
O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related.
O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related.
Transcribed Image Text:In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. H₂: H₁: Determine the test statistic. x² = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic. ▼ P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? C Survey Results Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Print Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes No 735 151 Done 3036 4489 X O A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O B. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related.
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two
risky behaviors independent of each other?
Click the icon to view the table of survey results.
Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
Ho:
H₁:
Dete
x²=
=
Dete
P-va
Survey Results
Do tl
Texted While Driving
No Texting While Driving
Drove When Drinking Alcohol?
Yes
No
735
151
Print
Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol.
Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent.
Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent.
Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors.
OA
O B.
ection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.
Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.
O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related.
O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related.
3036
4489
Done
D
X
Transcribed Image Text:In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: H₁: Dete x²= = Dete P-va Survey Results Do tl Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes No 735 151 Print Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol. Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent. Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent. Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors. OA O B. ection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. 3036 4489 Done D X
Expert Solution
Step 1

The given table is

  Drove when Drinking Alcohol?
  Yes No
Texted While Driving 735 3036
No Texting While Driving 151

4489

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman