Define S to be the following relation on R[x]: S = {(f, g) = R [x]²: (x + 1) divides (g - f) in R[x] }. You may assume that S is an equivalence relation. i. Prove that, if (f₁, f₂) = S and (9₁, 9₂) € S for some f₁, f2, 91, 92 € R [x], then also (f₁ + 9₁, f₂ +9₂) € S. ii. Suppose we wanted to prove that the set P of equivalence classes of S is a ring, similar to how we proved that Zm is a ring in the notes. Explain how part (i) would come up within the proof that P is a ring.
Define S to be the following relation on R[x]: S = {(f, g) = R [x]²: (x + 1) divides (g - f) in R[x] }. You may assume that S is an equivalence relation. i. Prove that, if (f₁, f₂) = S and (9₁, 9₂) € S for some f₁, f2, 91, 92 € R [x], then also (f₁ + 9₁, f₂ +9₂) € S. ii. Suppose we wanted to prove that the set P of equivalence classes of S is a ring, similar to how we proved that Zm is a ring in the notes. Explain how part (i) would come up within the proof that P is a ring.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
![Define
S to be the following relation on R[x]:
S = {(f, g) = R [x]²: (x + 1) divides (g − f) in R[x]}.
You may assume that S is an equivalence relation.
i. Prove that, if (f₁, f₂) = S and (9₁, 92) € S for some f₁, f2, 91, 92 € R [x], then also (f₁ + 9₁, f₂ +9₂) € S.
ii. Suppose we wanted to prove that the set P of equivalence classes of S is a ring, similar to how we proved that Zm is a ring in the notes.
Explain how part (i) would come up within the proof that P is a ring.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F2ee3bb22-7c67-41f0-af8a-4c43d796c49d%2F7db0a5a3-45a5-425f-a94f-41a00fdafc65%2Fhlkys9je_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Define
S to be the following relation on R[x]:
S = {(f, g) = R [x]²: (x + 1) divides (g − f) in R[x]}.
You may assume that S is an equivalence relation.
i. Prove that, if (f₁, f₂) = S and (9₁, 92) € S for some f₁, f2, 91, 92 € R [x], then also (f₁ + 9₁, f₂ +9₂) € S.
ii. Suppose we wanted to prove that the set P of equivalence classes of S is a ring, similar to how we proved that Zm is a ring in the notes.
Explain how part (i) would come up within the proof that P is a ring.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Recommended textbooks for you

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,

