December 31 (in millions) Raw materials and work in process Finished goods Unbilled shipments Less revaluation to LIFO 2009 2008 $7,581 $8,710 4,105 5,032 759 561 12,445 14,303 (529) (706) $11,916 $13,597 The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method. (a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet? $0 (million) (b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing? 50 (million)

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

A-5

December 31 (in millions)
Raw materials and work in process
Finished goods
Unbilled shipments
Less revaluation to LIFO
2009 2008
$7,581 $8,710
4,105 5,032
759 561
12,445 14,303
(529) (706)
$ 11,916 $13,597
The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method.
(a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet?
$0
(million)
(b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing?
$0
(million)
(c) What cumulative effect has GE's choice of LIFO over FIFO had on its pretax income as of year end 2009?
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has not changed. LIFO and FIFO are simply two different ways to account for inventories. Both methods lead to the same pretax income.
OThe cumulative effect on pretax income is nonexistent. The LIFO and FIFO methods of inventory accounting cause only cash flow effects, and they do not affect pretax income.
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has increased. FIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.
(d) Assume GE has a 35% income tax rate. As of the 2009 year-end, how much has GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.)
SO
(million)
(e) What effect has the use of LIFO inventory costing had on GE's pretax income and tax expense for 2009 only (assume a 35% income tax rate)? (Round answers to the nearest whole number.)
2009 pretax income:
by $ 0
million.
2009 tax expense:
by $ 0
Please answer all parts of the question.
million.
Transcribed Image Text:December 31 (in millions) Raw materials and work in process Finished goods Unbilled shipments Less revaluation to LIFO 2009 2008 $7,581 $8,710 4,105 5,032 759 561 12,445 14,303 (529) (706) $ 11,916 $13,597 The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method. (a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet? $0 (million) (b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing? $0 (million) (c) What cumulative effect has GE's choice of LIFO over FIFO had on its pretax income as of year end 2009? OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has not changed. LIFO and FIFO are simply two different ways to account for inventories. Both methods lead to the same pretax income. OThe cumulative effect on pretax income is nonexistent. The LIFO and FIFO methods of inventory accounting cause only cash flow effects, and they do not affect pretax income. OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains. OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has increased. FIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains. (d) Assume GE has a 35% income tax rate. As of the 2009 year-end, how much has GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) SO (million) (e) What effect has the use of LIFO inventory costing had on GE's pretax income and tax expense for 2009 only (assume a 35% income tax rate)? (Round answers to the nearest whole number.) 2009 pretax income: by $ 0 million. 2009 tax expense: by $ 0 Please answer all parts of the question. million.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Accounting for Merchandise Inventory
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education