Consider the pure exchange economy with 2 goods, good 1 and good 2, and two consumers, consumer A and consumer B. The consumers have the following utility functions: UA(X1A,X2A)=x1A+3×2A; UB(×1B,×2B)=x1B +x2B- Consumer A is initially endowed with 4 units of good A and no unit of good 2, that is, consumer A's initial endowment is (w1A,W2A)=(4,0). Consumer B is initially endowed with 3 units of good 2 and no unit of good 1, that is, (W1B,W2B)=(0,3). In order to implement the allocation (x1A,X2A)=(2,3), (x1B.,X2B)=(2,0) as a Walrasian equilibrium, what should the relative price p1/p2 of good 1 be?

Consider the pure exchange economy with 2 goods, good 1 and good 2, and two consumers, consumer A and consumer B. The consumers have the following utility functions: UA(X1A,X2A)=x1A+3×2A; UB(×1B,×2B)=x1B +x2B- Consumer A is initially endowed with 4 units of good A and no unit of good 2, that is, consumer A's initial endowment is (w1A,W2A)=(4,0). Consumer B is initially endowed with 3 units of good 2 and no unit of good 1, that is, (W1B,W2B)=(0,3). In order to implement the allocation (x1A,X2A)=(2,3), (x1B.,X2B)=(2,0) as a Walrasian equilibrium, what should the relative price p1/p2 of good 1 be?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

(PLEASE HELP WITH 1, 2, AND 3. ) 1. Each individual outcome of an experiment is called Group of answer choices the sample space an experiment an individual a sample point 2. Any process that generates well-defined outcomes is Group of answer choices an experiment an event a sample point a sample space 3. The counting rule that is used for counting the number of experimental outcomes when n objects are selected from a set of N objects where order of selection is not important is called Group of answer choices combination multiple step experiment permutation None of these alternatives is correct.
.A researcher is collecting individual data by asking visitors in a train station in a medium sized town to fill in a questionnaire. It takes nearly 30 minutes to complete the survey questions. To encourage higher participation rate, the researcher provides a small financial incentive that is enough to buy a sandwich. The researcher wants to use this sample to make predictions about effect of using social media on health among the residents of the town. a. Explain the random sampling assumption, that is one of the Gauss-Markov assumptions for linear regressions. b. Do you think this assumption is satisfied in the sample collected by the researcher? c. What are the possible consequences of violation of random sampling assumption for predictions based on this sample?
clai)= A.Q, claz) = Bq A CA, B,a,P) ail positive Q = Dp> all positive
Good X (250x soy (150X, 150Y) (100X, 100Y) 150X, 250Y) IC2 Income= $2000, Py=$10, P,=$10 reome=$2000, PE10, P,=$10 Good Y O Good X is normal O Good Y is normal O Good X is inferior O Good Y is inferior
Static Bayesian Games] We consider a games with 2 players. Player 1 has only asingle type; however, Player 2 can have two types I and D, each with probability 50%. Bothplayers have two actions available to them. The game has the following payoffs (P1 is the rowplayer, P2 the column player):
d, e and f please
Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Consider a class with 80 enrolled students. None of the students were ill at the beginning of the school year. On August 30th, 10 students reported having a common cold. All continued to be ill on September 1st, but all 10 recovered within 3 days. On September 15th, 5 more students had a cold. All of these students continued to be ill on September 16th, but all recovered 5 days later. In this example, assume that a person cannot have a cold more than once.calculate the cumulative incidence of the common cold in the class during the month of september
Exercise 1.4. There are two players. Each player is given an unmarked envelope and asked to put in it either nothing or $300 of his own money or $600. A referee collects the envelopes, opens them, gathers all the money, then adds 50% of that amount (using his own money) and divides the total into two equal parts which he then distributes to the players. (a) Represent this game frame with two alternative tables: the first table showing in each cell the amount of money distributed to Player 1 and the amount of money distributed to Player 2, the second table showing the change in wealth of each player (money received minus contribution). (b) Suppose that Player 1 has some animosity towards the referee and ranks the outcomes in terms of how much money the referee loses (the more, the better), while Player 2 is selfish and greedy and ranks the outcomes in terms of her own net gain. Represent the corresponding game using a table. (c) Is there a strict dominant-strategy equilibrium?
What is the variance of u conditional on income, var(ulinc)? Consider the following savings model: Where inc = income and sav = savings A. var(inche) B. incvar(e) C. var(sqrt(inc)) D. var(e) sav= Bo + B₁inc + u, u = √inc * e
Consider the following least squares specification between test scores (Y) and income: Y = 607.8 + 5.32 In (Income). According to this equation, a 1% increase income is associated with an increase in test scores of A. 5.32 points OB. 53.2 points O C. 607.8 points D. 0.0532 points
An increase in meat prices coincides with an increase in rainfall is an associative relationship the statement above is true/false?