Consider the following simultaneous-move game that represents the payoffs from different advertising campaigns (low, medium, and high spending) for two political candidates that are running for a particular office. The values in the payoff matrix represent the share of the popular vote earned by each candidate is given below. T equilibrium in dominant strategies Candidate A-low Candidate A-medium Candidate A-high Candidate B-low Candidate B-medium Candidate B-high 50, 50 60, 40 80, 20 40, 60 50, 50 65, 35 20, 80 35,65 50, 50

Consider the following simultaneous-move game that represents the payoffs from different advertising campaigns (low, medium, and high spending) for two political candidates that are running for a particular office. The values in the payoff matrix represent the share of the popular vote earned by each candidate is given below. T equilibrium in dominant strategies Candidate A-low Candidate A-medium Candidate A-high Candidate B-low Candidate B-medium Candidate B-high 50, 50 60, 40 80, 20 40, 60 50, 50 65, 35 20, 80 35,65 50, 50

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following game: Payoff Matrix Player B L M R U 10, 11 8, 13 7, 12 Player A C 14, 12 9,9 5, 7 D 12, 5 10, 6 8,8 Select the Nash equilibrium/equilibria of this game
There are three players in this simultaneous move game. Player-3 chooses between game A and game B. Player-1 chooses between U, M and D. Player-2 chooses between L and R. The payoffs are given below: P-1 U M D A P-2 L R 5,5,0 1,4,0 6,4,5 2,5,3 3,1,2 3,3,1 Find all pure strategy N.E. of this game. P-1 U M D L 4,8,0 4,1,3 3,5,1 B P-2 R 2,1,0 3,3,3 0,3,0
Consider the following sequential move game of imperfect information. Consider the following sequential move game of imperfect information. In the event that Otis chooses Down, then they play the simultaneous move game shown in normal form (where Otis chooses between X and Y and Maeve simultaneously chooses between W and V). A (25,6) Maeve Up B (5,10) (12,5) Otis Middle Maeve Down w Otis (0, 0) (10, 10) Y (15, 15) (0, 0) Find all (pure strategy) subgame perfect Nash equilibria.
find all Nash equilibria in this game using von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences:
Suppose that there are only two firms in a market in which demand is given by p = 64 - Q, where Q is the total production of the two firms. Each firm can choose either a low level of output, qL = 15, or a high level of output, qH = 20. The unit cost of production for both firms is $4. Write down the normal-form representation of the game in which the strategic variable for each firm is the quantity of output and the firms make their choices simultaneously. Find the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game (quantities produced and market price).
V4
Refer to the normal-form game of price competition in the payoff matrix below. Firm A Low Price High Price Firm B Low Price 0, 0 -10, 50 High Price 50, -10 20, 20 What are the secure strategies for Firm A and Firm B?
The following game is played by 2 players Adam Jack Left Middle Right Up 1,2 3,5 2,1 Middle 0,4 2,1 3,0 Down -1,1 4,3 0,2 Determine all dominant strategies for Adam and Jack. Solve the equilibrium for this game.
find all Nash equilibria in this game using von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences:
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium? Is the answer (B,B)? If not please explian what is the answer?
3. The following is an interpretation of the rivalry between the United States (USA) and the Soviet Ünion (USSR) during the cold war. Each side has the choice of two strategies: Aggressive and Restrained. The payoff table is given as follows: USSR Restrained Aggressiveness Restrained 4,3 1,4 USA Aggressiveness 3,1 2,2 a) Consider this game when the two countries move simultaneously. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria. b) Next consider three alternative ways in which the game could be played with sequential moves: (i) The USA moves first and the USSR moves second. (i) the USSR moves first and the USA moves second. (i) The USSR moves first, and the USA moves second, but the USSR has a further move after the USA moves. For each case, draw the game tree and find the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium. c) What are the key strategic issues (commitment, credibility and so on) for the two countries. (Note: Be concise. Your answer should not exceed 300 words].
Consider the following information for a static game. If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $5 million in profits. If you choose not to advertise and your rival chooses not to advertise, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $15 million and the firm that does not advertise will earn $1 million. Assuming that each player cares only about his or her own profits, the Nash equilibrium is? Explain your answer in three long paragraphs (intro body and conclusion)