Consider the following relation for student records: GRADEREPORT(Student|D, StudentName, StudentMajor, StudentStreetAddress, CourselD, CourseTitle, CourseCreditPoints, CourseSemesterYear, CourselnstructorlID, InstructorID, InstructorName, InstructorOffice, Grade) Given that the following dependencies exist: StudentID -> StudentName, StudentMajor, StudentStreetAddress CourselD->CourseTitle, CourseCreditPoints, CourselnstructorID StudentResult -> CourselD, CourseSemesterYear, Grade Instructor -> InstructorID, InstructorName, InstructorOffice A1. Why is the relation in 1NF? State the reason briefly.

Consider the following relation for student records: GRADEREPORT(Student|D, StudentName, StudentMajor, StudentStreetAddress, CourselD, CourseTitle, CourseCreditPoints, CourseSemesterYear, CourselnstructorlID, InstructorID, InstructorName, InstructorOffice, Grade) Given that the following dependencies exist: StudentID -> StudentName, StudentMajor, StudentStreetAddress CourselD->CourseTitle, CourseCreditPoints, CourselnstructorID StudentResult -> CourselD, CourseSemesterYear, Grade Instructor -> InstructorID, InstructorName, InstructorOffice A1. Why is the relation in 1NF? State the reason briefly.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following functional dependencies describe a relation that is in 3NF.Book_ID -> Genre_ID, Genre_TypeGenre_ID -> Genre_Type True or False? Thanks.
The following relations kind a part of a on-line database (the relations area unit self-explanatory): CUSTOMER/CLIENT/SHOPPERS/BUYERS(Cust#, CAddress, Ctown, Balance,Cname) ORDER(Order.#, Date, Cust#.) ORDERLINE(Order#, Part#., Amount-Ordered) PART(Part#., Desc, Stock, Item-Class, Unit -Price) Design a physical ER for the above scenario. With respect to this relative schema, write SQL statements for the subsequent queries: List the name of the client United Nations agency has placed Order 123 (i.e. Order: = 123). List the names of shoppers United Nations agency in Cardiff and have ordered half 456 (i.e. Part. 456). List the order numbers (Order) for orders that contain a minimum of three elements and also the quantity ordered are minimum of ten. List the outline (Desc), of these elements that the typical quantity ordered is bigger than the number ordered for half .6 (Part. = 456) so as 123.(Order. .123).
Use the following data model for this question:Fishfish_idnameDailyCatchcatch_iddateFish_Catchfish_catch_idcatch_idfish_idWhich of the following is a situation where an OUTER JOIN could be useful? When a fisherman wants to see only the fish that she has not caught When a fisherman wants to see all fish in the database including those that she has caught and those that she has not caught before When a fisherman wants to see only fish in the database that she has caught When a fisherman wants to see the fish that belong to a certain species
The properties of the relation object can be used to implement the master-detail functionality which most appropriate for your application. You can delete a master-detail relation by selecting it in the Object Navigator and choosing Navigator => Delete. Discuss the Deletion of Relations in detail.
DATABASE SYSTEM A relation R is given which is R(A,B,C,D,E). It has the following functional dependencies: BC -> ADE , D -> B. Answer the following based on this information. Which normal forms does this relation satisfy? Which type of dependencies does this relation violate? Normalize the relationship so that it decomposes to 3NF.
Relational Database A relation R is given which is R(A,B,C,D,E). It has the following functional dependencies: BC -> E, E -> A and B -> D. Answer the following based on this information. Find all the candidate keys. What type of dependencies are found in this relation? Which normal form does this relation satisfy? Is it in 3NF? If not, decompose it until 3NF
Assume a user creates a new relation r1 with a foreign key that links to another relation r2. What degree of r2 access does the user need? Why can't something be done without prior authorization?
Consider R1(A, B, C, D) with the above functional dependencies. What would be a candidate key for R1?
Consider the scenario below: A user creates a new relation r1 with a foreign key referencing another relation r2. What authorization privileges does the user need on r2 for effective operation? Why should this not be permitted without such authorization?
A) The following relations kind a part of a on-line database (the relations area unit self- explanatory): CUSTOMER/CLIENT/SHOPPERS/BUYERS(Cust#, CAddress, Ctown, Balance, Cname) ORDER(Order.# Date, Cust#.) ORDERLINE(Order#, Part#, Amount-Ordered) PART(Part#., Desc, Stock, Item-Class, Unit -Price) a. Design a physical ER for the above scenario. b. With respect to this relative schema, write SQL statements for the subsequent queries: 1. List the name of the client United Nations agency has placed Order 123 (i.e. Order: = 123). 2. List the names of shoppers United Nations agency in Cardiff and have ordered half 456 (i.e. Part. 456). 3. List the order numbers (Order) for orders that contain a minimum of three elements and also the quantity ordered are minimum of ten. 4. List the outline (Desc), of these elements that the typical quantity ordered is bigger than the number ordered for half .6 (Part. = 456) so as 123.(Order..123).
Given the following relation R and its functional dependencies, what is the key of R? R(A, B, C, D, E, F) F = A --> B, B --> E, E --> C}
The following functional dependencies describe a relation that is in 2NF.Customer_ID, Store_ID -> Store-Location, Customer_AddressStore_ID -> Store-Location True or False? Thanks