Consider a choice structure (X, B, C) where X is finite and B includes all two and three element subsets of X. Which of the following are true statements? Condition a and Condition 3 imply the WARP . 1. Condition a and Condition 3 are implied by the WARP. * Condition a implies Condition 3, provided C(B) has exactly one element for every BEB. A preference relation (complete, reflexive and transitive relation) ≥ that rationalizes the agent's choice may not exist even though the Weak Axiom is satisfied.

Consider a choice structure (X, B, C) where X is finite and B includes all two and three element subsets of X. Which of the following are true statements? Condition a and Condition 3 imply the WARP . 1. Condition a and Condition 3 are implied by the WARP. * Condition a implies Condition 3, provided C(B) has exactly one element for every BEB. A preference relation (complete, reflexive and transitive relation) ≥ that rationalizes the agent's choice may not exist even though the Weak Axiom is satisfied.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a consumer with utility function u(x1, x2) = a 1x_1^( 2) + a_2x_2^( 2) where a1 > 0 and a2 > 0. Assume that p1, p2 > 0. (a) Show that the utility function represents strongly monotone preferences (b) Draw indifference curves passing through points (1, 2), (3, 3) and (0, 3). What properties of the preference relation can you derive from these indifference curves? (c) State the expenditure minimization problem and derive the Hicksian demand. Does the EMP problem have a unique solution at every price vector p >> 0? (d) Derive expenditure function e(p, u). Verify that it is homogeneous of degree 1 in p and increasing in u. (e) Using expenditure function and Hicksian demand, calculate Walrasian demand and indirect utility
Give examples of preference relation that is monotone but not continuous and is representable by a utility function.
Suppose that you want to derive and draw the demand function for Mr. Seong (also known as Player 456). Mr. Seong likes to eat Dalgona Candy (D) and drink Soju (S). Suppose Mr. Seong's preferences can be expressed as U(D,S) = (D)º.² · (S)0.8. Suppose further the price of a Dalgona Candy is 2 (pº = 2) and the price of Soju is 4 (ps = 4). Mr. Seong has a budget of 100 to spend on the two goods. A. Use the substitution method to find Mr. Seong's optimal choice of Dalgona Candy and Soju. B. Use any method to find Mr. Seong's optimal choice of Dalgona Candy and Soju if the price of Soju was 5 (instead of 4). Feel free to use the Cobb-Douglas short-cut method if you want. C. Use your answers to A and B to derive the demand for Soju in the two diagrams below. That is, draw the change in the top diagram and then use your result to derive the demand curve in the bottom diagram. Several hints have been drawn in the diagram below. D 50 10 ps 5 4 20 20 25 S FYI: The Cobb-Douglas short-cut can be…
Need help for questions d),e),f)
If u(x1, x2) = x1 + x2 represents the individual's preferences, then V(x1, x2) = -1/(x1 + x2) also represents the individual's preferences. True, Uncertain or False?
Consider a consumer with utility function u(x1, x2) = min{4 min{x1, x2}, x1 + x2} (a) Draw indifference curves passing through points (2, 2), (1, 2) and (4, 2). Make sure you correctly determine kink points. What properties of the preferences can you deduce from the shape of indifference curves? (b) When X = R2 +, does UMP have a solution when p1 = p2 = 0? What property of the preference relation did you use to get your answer? (c) Assume that prices are such that p1, p2 2 0 and that p` > 0 for some `e {1, 2} (i.e. the price of at least one good is positive). Derive Walrasian demand. What are the prices for which Walrasian demand is single-valued?
Assume that a∈[-1,1] and θ∈(0,2). The utility function is given by u(a,θ)=a(θ-1). Which of the following action is never optimal ex-post? a. 0 b. All can be optimal ex-post c. 1 d. -1
State the implications of the weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP) for consumer choice. The following table indicates a consumer's observed choices for two goods, a1 and *2, under three sets of prices: period Pi P2 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 4 3 1 Do these choices satisfy WARP? Explain why or why not.
A consumer is observed making two choices. First, he faces prices p = (1,3) with wealth w = 8 but is limited to purchasing no more than 3 units of good 1. Given this budget set, he chooses the bundle x = (2, 2). Second, he faces prices p' = (2,1) and wealth w' = 8 with no limit on his purchases of either good. Given this budget set, he chooses the bundle 2' = (4,0). dentify all revealed preferences given these choices. Do this consumer's choices satisfy the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference? - Could these choices result from the consumer choosing optimally given some mono- tone, convex, and continuous preferences? Explain your answer carefully; you do not have to provide a formal proof.
3.