Consider a a two state model. Suppose that there are two consumers, A and B, with endowments of wA = (4, 6) and wB = (6,8). Let the objective probability of state 1 occuring be T. Suppose that both consumers are expected utility maximizers and strictly risk averse and that they have identical preferences TU(C1)+ (1 – 7)u(c2) with u'(-) > 0, and u"(·) < 0. | 1. Is there ideosyncratic risk? Is there aggregate risk? Demonstrate/explain. 2. I claim that neither consumer will be fully insured in the Walrasian equilibrium of this economy. Prove this claim. 3. What (if anything) can we say about the Walrasian Equilibrium price ratio in this economy?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

do not only give definitions, answer questions properly

And plzz give the answer of all questions. 

Consider a a two state model. Suppose that there are two consumers, A and B, with
endowments of wA = (4, 6) and wB = (6,8).
Let the objective probability of state 1 occuring be r. Suppose that both consumers are
expected utility maximizers and strictly risk averse and that they have identical preferences
TU(C1)+ (1 – 1)u(c2) with u'(-) > 0, and u"(·) < 0.
1. Is there ideosyncratic risk? Is there aggregate risk? Demonstrate/explain.
2. I claim that neither consumer will be fully insured in the Walrasian equilibrium of this
economy. Prove this claim.
3. What (if anything) can we say about the Walrasian Equilibrium price ratio in this
economy?
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a a two state model. Suppose that there are two consumers, A and B, with endowments of wA = (4, 6) and wB = (6,8). Let the objective probability of state 1 occuring be r. Suppose that both consumers are expected utility maximizers and strictly risk averse and that they have identical preferences TU(C1)+ (1 – 1)u(c2) with u'(-) > 0, and u"(·) < 0. 1. Is there ideosyncratic risk? Is there aggregate risk? Demonstrate/explain. 2. I claim that neither consumer will be fully insured in the Walrasian equilibrium of this economy. Prove this claim. 3. What (if anything) can we say about the Walrasian Equilibrium price ratio in this economy?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Property Rights, Bargaining And The Coase Theorem
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education