Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15% -per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ -35,000 -30,000 Current market value, $ 15,000 Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 5,000 -6,000 -3,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year The AW of the defender is $- Wilma (Click to select) correct. and the AW of the challenger is $-

Please see attachment and type out the correct answer ASAP with proper explanation of it within 40 50 minutes.  Will give you thumbs up only for the correct answer. Thank you

oncurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2 -year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5 -year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? \table[[Equipment,Current,Proposed],[Original purchase price, $,-30,000,-42,000

Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15% per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method. a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Proposed 42,000 Original purchase price. S Current market value, S Remaining life, years stimated value in 5 years, S Salvage value after 15 years. S AOCES per year The AW of the defender a $- Wilma Click to select correct Current -30,000 15.000 5 2000 -13.000 15 30.000 5.000 -3,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-

Machine D E First cost, $ −62,000 −77,000 AOC, $ per year −15,000 −21,000 Salvage value, $ 8,000 10,000 Life, years 4 6   NOTE: This is a multi-part question. Once an answer is submitted, you will be unable to return to this part.   Select between two metal-constricting machines. Use the corporate MARR of 15% per year with future worth analysis using tabulated factors.

Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ -30,000 -42,000 15,000 Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 5,000 -3,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year The AW of the defender is $- Wilma (Click to select) correct. -14,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-

Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ −30,000 −36,000 Current market value, $ 15,000 -- Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ -- 5,000 AOC, $ per year −7,000 −3,000   The AW of the defender is $−  and the AW of the challenger is $−  .   Wilma         (Click to select) is is not  correct.

Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ Remaining life, years Estimated value in 5 years, $ Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year Current -30,000 15,000 5 7,000 -11,000 The AW of the defender is $- challenger is $- Wilma ((Click to select)) correct. Proposed -40,000 -- 15 10,000 5,000 -3,000 and the AW of the

A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $7000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1600. A new power line will cost $14000 to install, with power costs expected to be $1300 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 8.00% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis? (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The future worth of solar cells is $[ and that of electric line is $ (Click to select) :) should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis.

(2) If the initial investment on the equipment is 25000 and it will have a salvage value of 5000 at the end of 5 years. It will save 8000 per year for the study period. Is it worthwhile to install the equipment? Justify it by using Future Worth (FW) formulation when MARR is 20%